The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.

> Preamble
> Article I
> Article II
> Article III
> Article IV
> Article V
> Article VI
> Article VII
> Article VIII
> Article IX
> Article X
> Article XI
> Article XII
> Article XIII
> Article XIV
> Article XV
> Article XVI
> Article XVII
> Article XVIII
> Article XIX
> Article XX
> Article XXI
> Article XXII
> Article XXIII
> Article XXIV
> Appendix I
> Decision on Accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement
> Notes

> Analytical Index main page

VII. Article VI     back to top

A. Text of Article VI

Article VI: Technical Specifications

1.      Technical specifications laying down the characteristics of the products or services to be procured, such as quality, performance, safety and dimensions, symbols, terminology, packaging, marking and labelling, or the processes and methods for their production and requirements relating to conformity assessment procedures prescribed by procuring entities, shall not be prepared, adopted or applied with a view to, or with the effect of, creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade.

2.      Technical specifications prescribed by procuring entities shall, where appropriate:

(a)      be in terms of performance rather than design or descriptive characteristics; and

(b)      be based on international standards, where such exist; otherwise, on national technical regulations,(3) recognized national standards,(4) or building codes.

(footnote original) 3 For the purpose of this Agreement, a technical regulation is a document which lays down characteristics of a product or a service or their related processes and production methods, including the applicable administrative provisions, with which compliance is mandatory. It may also include or deal exclusively with terminology, symbols, packaging, marking or labelling requirements as they apply to a product, service, process or production method.

(footnote original) 4 For the purpose of this Agreement, a standard is a document approved by a recognized body, that provides, for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for products or services or related processes and production methods, with which compliance is not mandatory. It may also include or deal exclusively with terminology, symbols, packaging, marking or labelling requirements as they apply to a product, service, process or production method.

3.      There shall be no requirement or reference to a particular trademark or trade name, patent, design or type, specific origin, producer or supplier, unless there is no sufficiently precise or intelligible way of describing the procurement requirements and provided that words such as “or equivalent” are included in the tender documentation.

4.      Entities shall not seek or accept, in a manner which would have the effect of precluding competition, advice which may be used in the preparation of specifications for a specific procurement from a firm that may have a commercial interest in the procurement.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article VI

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

VIII. Article VII     back to top

A. Text of Article VII

Article VII: Tendering Procedures

1.      Each Party shall ensure that the tendering procedures of its entities are applied in a non-discriminatory manner and are consistent with the provisions contained in Articles VII through XVI.

2.      Entities shall not provide to any supplier information with regard to a specific procurement in a manner which would have the effect of precluding competition.

3.      For the purposes of this Agreement:

(a)      Open tendering procedures are those procedures under which all interested suppliers may submit a tender.

(b)      Selective tendering procedures are those procedures under which, consistent with paragraph 3 of Article X and other relevant provisions of this Agreement, those suppliers invited to do so by the entity may submit a tender.

(c)      Limited tendering procedures are those procedures where the entity contacts suppliers individually, only under the conditions specified in Article XV.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article VII

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

IX. Article VIII     back to top

A. Text of Article VIII

Article VIII: Qualification of Suppliers

          In the process of qualifying suppliers, entities shall not discriminate among suppliers of other Parties or between domestic suppliers and suppliers of other Parties. Qualification procedures shall be consistent with the following:

(a)      any conditions for participation in tendering procedures shall be published in adequate time to enable interested suppliers to initiate and, to the extent that it is compatible with efficient operation of the procurement process, complete the qualification procedures;

(b)      any conditions for participation in tendering procedures shall be limited to those which are essential to ensure the firm’s capability to fulfil the contract in question. Any conditions for participation required from suppliers, including financial guarantees, technical qualifications and information necessary for establishing the financial, commercial and technical capacity of suppliers, as well as the verification of qualifications, shall be no less favourable to suppliers of other Parties than to domestic suppliers and shall not discriminate among suppliers of other Parties. The financial, commercial and technical capacity of a supplier shall be judged on the basis both of that supplier’s global business activity as well as of its activity in the territory of the procuring entity, taking due account of the legal relationship between the supply organizations;

(c)      the process of, and the time required for, qualifying suppliers shall not be used in order to keep suppliers of other Parties off a suppliers’ list or from being considered for a particular intended procurement. Entities shall recognize as qualified suppliers such domestic suppliers or suppliers of other Parties who meet the conditions for participation in a particular intended procurement. Suppliers requesting to participate in a particular intended procurement who may not yet be qualified shall also be considered, provided there is sufficient time to complete the qualification procedure;

(d)      entities maintaining permanent lists of qualified suppliers shall ensure that suppliers may apply for qualification at any time; and that all qualified suppliers so requesting are included in the lists within a reasonably short time;

(e)      if, after publication of the notice under paragraph 1 of Article IX, a supplier not yet qualified requests to participate in an intended procurement, the entity shall promptly start procedures for qualification;

(f)      any supplier having requested to become a qualified supplier shall be advised by the entities concerned of the decision in this regard. Qualified suppliers included on permanent lists by entities shall also be notified of the termination of any such lists or of their removal from them;

(g)      each Party shall ensure that:

(i)      each entity and its constituent parts follow a single qualification procedure, except in cases of duly substantiated need for a different procedure; and

(ii)     efforts be made to minimize differences in qualification procedures between entities;

(h)      nothing in subparagraphs (a) through (g) shall preclude the exclusion of any supplier on grounds such as bankruptcy or false declarations, provided that such an action is consistent with the national treatment and nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article VIII

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

X. Article IX     back to top

A. Text of Article IX

Article IX: Invitation to Participate Regarding Intended Procurement

1.      In accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, entities shall publish an invitation to participate for all cases of intended procurement, except as otherwise provided for in Article XV (limited tendering). The notice shall be published in the appropriate publication listed in Appendix II.

2.      The invitation to participate may take the form of a notice of proposed procurement, as provided for in paragraph 6.

3.      Entities in Annexes 2 and 3 may use a notice of planned procurement, as provided for in paragraph 7, or a notice regarding a qualification system, as provided for in paragraph 9, as an invitation to participate.

4.      Entities which use a notice of planned procurement as an invitation to participate shall subsequently invite all suppliers who have expressed an interest to confirm their interest on the basis of information which shall include at least the information referred to in paragraph 6.

5.      Entities which use a notice regarding a qualification system as an invitation to participate shall provide, subject to the considerations referred to in paragraph 4 of Article XVIII and in a timely manner, information which allows all those who have expressed an interest to have a meaningful opportunity to assess their interest in participating in the procurement. This information shall include the information contained in the notices referred to in paragraphs 6 and 8, to the extent such information is available. Information provided to one interested supplier shall be provided in a non-discriminatory manner to the other interested suppliers.

6.      Each notice of proposed procurement, referred to in paragraph 2, shall contain the following information:

(a)      the nature and quantity, including any options for further procurement and, if possible, an estimate of the timing when such options may be exercised; in the case of recurring contracts the nature and quantity and, if possible, an estimate of the timing of the subsequent tender notices for the products or services to be procured;

(b)      whether the procedure is open or selective or will involve negotiation;

(c)      any date for starting delivery or completion of delivery of goods or services;

(d)      the address and final date for submitting an application to be invited to tender or for qualifying for the suppliers’ lists, or for receiving tenders, as well as the language or languages in which they must be submitted;

(e)      the address of the entity awarding the contract and providing any information necessary for obtaining specifications and other documents;

(f)      any economic and technical requirements, financial guarantees and information required from suppliers;

(g)      the amount and terms of payment of any sum payable for the tender documentation; and

(h)      whether the entity is inviting offers for purchase, lease, rental or hire purchase, or more than one of these methods.

7.      Each notice of planned procurement referred to in paragraph 3 shall contain as much of the information referred to in paragraph 6 as is available. It shall in any case include the information referred to in paragraph 8 and:

(a)      a statement that interested suppliers should express their interest in the procurement to the entity;

(b)      a contact point with the entity from which further information may be obtained.

8.      For each case of intended procurement, the entity shall publish a summary notice in one of the official languages of the WTO. The notice shall contain at least the following information:

(a)      the subject matter of the contract;

(b)      the time-limits set for the submission of tenders or an application to be invited to tender; and

(c)      the addresses from which documents relating to the contracts may be requested.

9.      In the case of selective tendering procedures, entities maintaining permanent lists of qualified suppliers shall publish annually in one of the publications listed in Appendix III a notice of the following:

(a)      the enumeration of the lists maintained, including their headings, in relation to the products or services or categories of products or services to be procured through the lists;

(b)      the conditions to be fulfilled by suppliers with a view to their inscription on those lists and the methods according to which each of those conditions will be verified by the entity concerned; and

(c)      the period of validity of the lists, and the formalities for their renewal.

When such a notice is used as an invitation to participate in accordance with paragraph 3, the notice shall, in addition, include the following information:

(d)      the nature of the products or services concerned;

(e)      a statement that the notice constitutes an invitation to participate.

However, when the duration of the qualification system is three years or less, and if the duration of the system is made clear in the notice and it is also made clear that further notices will not be published, it shall be sufficient to publish the notice once only, at the beginning of the system. Such a system shall not be used in a manner which circumvents the provisions of this Agreement.

10.     If, after publication of an invitation to participate in any case of intended procurement, but before the time set for opening or receipt of tenders as specified in the notices or the tender documentation, it becomes necessary to amend or re-issue the notice, the amendment or the re-issued notice shall be given the same circulation as the original documents upon which the amendment is based. Any significant information given to one supplier with respect to a particular intended procurement shall be given simultaneously to all other suppliers concerned in adequate time to permit the suppliers to consider such information and to respond to it.

11.     Entities shall make clear, in the notices referred to in this Article or in the publication in which the notices appear, that the procurement is covered by the Agreement.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article IX

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XI. Article X     back to top

A. Text of Article X

Article X: Selection Procedures

1.      To ensure optimum effective international competition under selective tendering procedures, entities shall, for each intended procurement, invite tenders from the maximum number of domestic suppliers and suppliers of other Parties, consistent with the efficient operation of the procurement system. They shall select the suppliers to participate in the procedure in a fair and non-discriminatory manner.

2.      Entities maintaining permanent lists of qualified suppliers may select suppliers to be invited to tender from among those listed. Any selection shall allow for equitable opportunities for suppliers on the lists.

3.      Suppliers requesting to participate in a particular intended procurement shall be permitted to submit a tender and be considered, provided, in the case of those not yet qualified, there is sufficient time to complete the qualification procedure under Articles VIII and IX. The number of additional suppliers permitted to participate shall be limited only by the efficient operation of the procurement system.

4.      Requests to participate in selective tendering procedures may be submitted by telex, telegram or facsimile.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article X

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XII. Article XI     back to top

A. Text of Article XI

Article XI: Time-limits for Tendering and Delivery

General

1.      (a)      Any prescribed time-limit shall be adequate to allow suppliers of other Parties as well as domestic suppliers to prepare and submit tenders before the closing of the tendering procedures. In determining any such time-limit, entities shall, consistent with their own reasonable needs, take into account such factors as the complexity of the intended procurement, the extent of subcontracting anticipated and the normal time for transmitting tenders by mail from foreign as well as domestic points.

(b)      Each Party shall ensure that its entities shall take due account of publication delays when setting the final date for receipt of tenders or of applications to be invited to tender.

Deadlines

2.      Except in so far as provided in paragraph 3,

(a)      in open procedures, the period for the receipt of tenders shall not be less than 40 days from the date of publication referred to in paragraph 1 of Article IX;

(b)      in selective procedures not involving the use of a permanent list of qualified suppliers, the period for submitting an application to be invited to tender shall not be less than 25 days from the date of publication referred to in paragraph 1 of Article IX; the period for receipt of tenders shall in no case be less than 40 days from the date of issuance of the invitation to tender;

(c)      in selective procedures involving the use of a permanent list of qualified suppliers, the period for receipt of tenders shall not be less than 40 days from the date of the initial issuance of invitations to tender, whether or not the date of initial issuance of invitations to tender coincides with the date of the publication referred to in paragraph 1 of Article IX.

3.      The periods referred to in paragraph 2 may be reduced in the circumstances set out below:

(a)      if a separate notice has been published 40 days and not more than 12 months in advance and the notice contains at least:

(i)      as much of the information referred to in paragraph 6 of Article IX as is available;

(ii)     the information referred to in paragraph 8 of Article IX;

(iii)    a statement that interested suppliers should express their interest in the procurement to the entity; and

(iv)    a contact point with the entity from which further information may be obtained,

the 40 day limit for receipt of tenders may be replaced by a period sufficiently long to enable responsive tendering, which, as a general rule, shall not be less than 24 days, but in any case not less than 10 days;

(b)      in the case of the second or subsequent publications dealing with contracts of a recurring nature within the meaning of paragraph 6 of Article IX, the 40 day limit for receipt of tenders may be reduced to not less than 24 days;

(c)      where a state of urgency duly substantiated by the entity renders impracticable the periods in question, the periods specified in paragraph 2 may be reduced but shall in no case be less than 10 days from the date of the publication referred to in paragraph 1 of Article IX; or

(d)      the period referred to in paragraph 2(c) may, for procurements by entities listed in Annexes 2 and 3, be fixed by mutual agreement between the entity and the selected suppliers. In the absence of agreement, the entity may fix periods which shall be sufficiently long to enable responsive tendering and shall in any case not be less than 10 days.

4.      Consistent with the entity’s own reasonable needs, any delivery date shall take into account such factors as the complexity of the intended procurement, the extent of subcontracting anticipated and the realistic time required for production, de-stocking and transport of goods from the points of supply or for supply of services.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XI

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XIII. Article XII     back to top

A. Text of Article XII

Article XII: Tender Documentation

1.      If, in tendering procedures, an entity allows tenders to be submitted in several languages, one of those languages shall be one of the official languages of the WTO.

2.      Tender documentation provided to suppliers shall contain all information necessary to permit them to submit responsive tenders, including information required to be published in the notice of intended procurement, except for paragraph 6(g) of Article IX, and the following:

(a)      the address of the entity to which tenders should be sent;

(b)      the address where requests for supplementary information should be sent;

(c)      the language or languages in which tenders and tendering documents must be submitted;

(d)      the closing date and time for receipt of tenders and the length of time during which any tender should be open for acceptance;

(e)      the persons authorized to be present at the opening of tenders and the date, time and place of this opening;

(f)      any economic and technical requirement, financial guarantees and information or documents required from suppliers;

(g)      a complete description of the products or services required or of any requirements including technical specifications, conformity certification to be fulfilled, necessary plans, drawings and instructional materials;

(h)      the criteria for awarding the contract, including any factors other than price that are to be considered in the evaluation of tenders and the cost elements to be included in evaluating tender prices, such as transport, insurance and inspection costs, and in the case of products or services of other Parties, customs duties and other import charges, taxes and currency of payment;

(i)      the terms of payment;

(j)      any other terms or conditions;

(k)      in accordance with Article XVII the terms and conditions, if any, under which tenders from countries not Parties to this Agreement, but which apply the procedures of that Article, will be entertained.

Forwarding of Tender Documentation by the Entities

3.       (a)      In open procedures, entities shall forward the tender documentation at the request of any supplier participating in the procedure, and shall reply promptly to any reasonable request for explanations relating thereto.

(b)      In selective procedures, entities shall forward the tender documentation at the request of any supplier requesting to participate, and shall reply promptly to any reasonable request for explanations relating thereto.

(c)      Entities shall reply promptly to any reasonable request for relevant information submitted by a supplier participating in the tendering procedure, on condition that such information does not give that supplier an advantage over its competitors in the procedure for the award of the contract.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XII

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XIV. Article XIII     back to top

A. Text of Article XIII

Article XIII: Submission, Receipt and Opening of Tenders and Awarding of Contracts

1.      The submission, receipt and opening of tenders and awarding of contracts shall be consistent with the following:

(a)      tenders shall normally be submitted in writing directly or by mail. If tenders by telex, telegram or facsimile are permitted, the tender made thereby must include all the information necessary for the evaluation of the tender, in particular the definitive price proposed by the tenderer and a statement that the tenderer agrees to all the terms, conditions and provisions of the invitation to tender. The tender must be confirmed promptly by letter or by the despatch of a signed copy of the telex, telegram or facsimile. Tenders presented by telephone shall not be permitted. The content of the telex, telegram or facsimile shall prevail where there is a difference or conflict between that content and any documentation received after the time-limit; and

(b)      the opportunities that may be given to tenderers to correct unintentional errors of form between the opening of tenders and the awarding of the contract shall not be permitted to give rise to any discriminatory practice.

Receipt of Tenders

2.      A supplier shall not be penalized if a tender is received in the office designated in the tender documentation after the time specified because of delay due solely to mishandling on the part of the entity. Tenders may also be considered in other exceptional circumstances if the procedures of the entity concerned so provide.

Opening of Tenders

3.      All tenders solicited under open or selective procedures by entities shall be received and opened under procedures and conditions guaranteeing the regularity of the openings. The receipt and opening of tenders shall also be consistent with the national treatment and nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement. Information on the opening of tenders shall remain with the entity concerned at the disposal of the government authorities responsible for the entity in order that it may be used if required under the procedures of Articles XVIII, XIX, XX and XXII.

Award of Contracts

4.       (a)      To be considered for award, a tender must, at the time of opening, conform to the essential requirements of the notices or tender documentation and be from a supplier which complies with the conditions for participation. If an entity has received a tender abnormally lower than other tenders submitted, it may enquire with the tenderer to ensure that it can comply with the conditions of participation and be capable of fulfilling the terms of the contract.

(b)      Unless in the public interest an entity decides not to issue the contract, the entity shall make the award to the tenderer who has been determined to be fully capable of undertaking the contract and whose tender, whether for domestic products or services, or products or services of other Parties, is either the lowest tender or the tender which in terms of the specific evaluation criteria set forth in the notices or tender documentation is determined to be the most advantageous.

(c)      Awards shall be made in accordance with the criteria and essential requirements specified in the tender documentation.

Option Clauses

5.      Option clauses shall not be used in a manner which circumvents the provisions of the Agreement.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XIII

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XV. Article XIV     back to top

A. Text of Article XIV

Article XIV: Negotiation

1.      A Party may provide for entities to conduct negotiations:

(a)      in the context of procurements in which they have indicated such intent, namely in the notice referred to in paragraph 2 of Article IX (the invitation to suppliers to participate in the procedure for the proposed procurement); or

(b)      when it appears from evaluation that no one tender is obviously the most advantageous in terms of the specific evaluation criteria set forth in the notices or tender documentation.

2.      Negotiations shall primarily be used to identify the strengths and weaknesses in tenders.

3.      Entities shall treat tenders in confidence. In particular, they shall not provide information intended to assist particular participants to bring their tenders up to the level of other participants.

4.      Entities shall not, in the course of negotiations, discriminate between different suppliers. In particular, they shall ensure that:

(a)      any elimination of participants is carried out in accordance with the criteria set forth in the notices and tender documentation;

(b)      all modifications to the criteria and to the technical requirements are transmitted in writing to all remaining participants in the negotiations;

(c)      all remaining participants are afforded an opportunity to submit new or amended submissions on the basis of the revised requirements; and

(d)      when negotiations are concluded, all participants remaining in the negotiations shall be permitted to submit final tenders in accordance with a common deadline.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XIV

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XVI. Article XV     back to top

A. Text of Article XV

Article XV: Limited Tendering

1.      The provisions of Articles VII through XIV governing open and selective tendering procedures need not apply in the following conditions, provided that limited tendering is not used with a view to avoiding maximum possible competition or in a manner which would constitute a means of discrimination among suppliers of other Parties or protection to domestic producers or suppliers:

(a)      in the absence of tenders in response to an open or selective tender, or when the tenders submitted have been collusive, or not in conformity with the essential requirements in the tender, or from suppliers who do not comply with the conditions for participation provided for in accordance with this Agreement, on condition, however, that the requirements of the initial tender are not substantially modified in the contract as awarded;

(b)      when, for works of art or for reasons connected with protection of exclusive rights, such as patents or copyrights, or in the absence of competition for technical reasons, the products or services can be supplied only by a particular supplier and no reasonable alternative or substitute exists;

(c)      in so far as is strictly necessary when, for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the entity, the products or services could not be obtained in time by means of open or selective tendering procedures;

(d)      for additional deliveries by the original supplier which are intended either as parts replacement for existing supplies, or installations, or as the extension of existing supplies, services, or installations where a change of supplier would compel the entity to procure equipment or services not meeting requirements of interchangeability with already existing equipment or services;(5)

(footnote original ) 5 It is the understanding that “existing equipment” includes software to the extent that the initial procurement of the software was covered by the Agreement.

(e)      when an entity procures prototypes or a first product or service which are developed at its request in the course of, and for, a particular contract for research, experiment, study or original development. When such contracts have been fulfilled, subsequent procurements of products or services shall be subject to Articles VII through XIV;(6)

(footnote original) 6 Original development of a first product or service may include limited production or supply in order to incorporate the results of field testing and to demonstrate that the product or service is suitable for production or supply in quantity to acceptable quality standards. It does not extend to quantity production or supply to establish commercial viability or to recover research and development costs.

(f)      when additional construction services which were not included in the initial contract but which were within the objectives of the original tender documentation have, through unforeseeable circumstances, become necessary to complete the construction services described therein, and the entity needs to award contracts for the additional construction services to the contractor carrying out the construction services concerned since the separation of the additional construction services from the initial contract would be difficult for technical or economic reasons and cause significant inconvenience to the entity. However, the total value of contracts awarded for the additional construction services may not exceed 50 per cent of the amount of the main contract;

(g)      for new construction services consisting of the repetition of similar construction services which conform to a basic project for which an initial contract was awarded in accordance with Articles VII through XIV and for which the entity has indicated in the notice of intended procurement concerning the initial construction service, that limited tendering procedures might be used in awarding contracts for such new construction services;

(h)      for products purchased on a commodity market;

(i)      for purchases made under exceptionally advantageous conditions which only arise in the very short term. This provision is intended to cover unusual disposals by firms which are not normally suppliers, or disposal of assets of businesses in liquidation or receivership. It is not intended to cover routine purchases from regular suppliers;

(j)      in the case of contracts awarded to the winner of a design contest provided that the contest has been organized in a manner which is consistent with the principles of this Agreement, notably as regards the publication, in the sense of Article IX, of an invitation to suitably qualified suppliers, to participate in such a contest which shall be judged by an independent jury with a view to design contracts being awarded to the winners.

2.      Entities shall prepare a report in writing on each contract awarded under the provisions of paragraph 1. Each report shall contain the name of the procuring entity, value and kind of goods or services procured, country of origin, and a statement of the conditions in this Article which prevailed. This report shall remain with the entities concerned at the disposal of the government authorities responsible for the entity in order that it may be used if required under the procedures of Articles XVIII, XIX, XX and XXII.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XV

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XVII. Article XVI     back to top

A. Text of Article XVI

Article XVI: Offsets

1.      Entities shall not, in the qualification and selection of suppliers, products or services, or in the evaluation of tenders and award of contracts, impose, seek or consider offsets.(7)

(footnote original) 7 Offsets in government procurement are measures used to encourage local development or improve the balance-of-payments accounts by means of domestic content, licensing of technology, investment requirements, counter trade or similar requirements.

2.      Nevertheless, having regard to general policy considerations, including those relating to development, a developing country may at the time of accession negotiate conditions for the use of offsets, such as requirements for the incorporation of domestic content. Such requirements shall be used only for qualification to participate in the procurement process and not as criteria for awarding contracts. Conditions shall be objective, clearly defined and non-discriminatory. They shall be set forth in the country’s Appendix I and may include precise limitations on the imposition of offsets in any contract subject to this Agreement. The existence of such conditions shall be notified to the Committee and included in the notice of intended procurement and other documentation.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XVI

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XVIII. Article XVII     back to top

A. Text of Article XVII

Article XVII: Transparency

1.      Each Party shall encourage entities to indicate the terms and conditions, including any deviations from competitive tendering procedures or access to challenge procedures, under which tenders will be entertained from suppliers situated in countries not Parties to this Agreement but which, with a view to creating transparency in their own contract awards, nevertheless:

(a)      specify their contracts in accordance with Article VI (technical specifications);

(b)      publish the procurement notices referred to in Article IX, including, in the version of the notice referred to in paragraph 8 of Article IX (summary of the notice of intended procurement) which is published in an official language of the WTO, an indication of the terms and conditions under which tenders shall be entertained from suppliers situated in countries Parties to this Agreement;

(c)      are willing to ensure that their procurement regulations shall not normally change during a procurement and, in the event that such change proves unavoidable, to ensure the availability of a satisfactory means of redress.

2.      Governments not Parties to the Agreement which comply with the conditions specified in paragraphs 1(a) through 1(c), shall be entitled if they so inform the Parties to participate in the Committee as observers.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XVII

1. Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement

4.      The Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement was established pursuant to the mandate provided in the Singapore Ministerial Declaration and paragraph 26 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration. Paragraph 26 reads as follows:

“Recognizing the case for a multilateral agreement on transparency in government procurement and the need for enhanced technical assistance and capacity building in this area, we agree that negotiations will take place after the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference on the basis of a decision to be taken, by explicit consensus, at that Session on modalities of negotiations. These negotiations will build on the progress made in the Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement by that time and take into account participants’ development priorities, especially those of least-developed country participants. Negotiations shall be limited to the transparency aspects and therefore will not restrict the scope for countries to give preferences to domestic supplies and suppliers. We commit ourselves to ensuring adequate technical assistance and support for capacity building both during the negotiations and after their conclusion.”(5)

XIX. Article XVIII     back to top

A. Text of Article XVIII

Article XVIII: Information and Review as Regards Obligations of Entities

1.      Entities shall publish a notice in the appropriate publication listed in Appendix II not later than 72 days after the award of each contract under Articles XIII through XV. These notices shall contain:

(a)      the nature and quantity of products or services in the contract award;

(b)      the name and address of the entity awarding the contract;

(c)      the date of award;

(d)      the name and address of winning tenderer;

(e)      the value of the winning award or the highest and lowest offer taken into account in the award of the contract;

(f)      where appropriate, means of identifying the notice issued under paragraph 1 of Article IX or justification according to Article XV for the use of such procedure; and

(g)      the type of procedure used.

2.      Each entity shall, on request from a supplier of a Party, promptly provide:

(a)      an explanation of its procurement practices and procedures;

(b)      pertinent information concerning the reasons why the supplier’s application to qualify was rejected, why its existing qualification was brought to an end and why it was not selected; and

(c)      to an unsuccessful tenderer, pertinent information concerning the reasons why its tender was not selected and on the characteristics and relative advantages of the tender selected as well as the name of the winning tenderer.

3.      Entities shall promptly inform participating suppliers of decisions on contract awards and, upon request, in writing.

4.      However, entities may decide that certain information on the contract award, contained in paragraphs 1 and 2(c), be withheld where release of such information would impede law enforcement or otherwise be contrary to the public interest or would prejudice the legitimate commercial interest of particular enterprises, public or private, or might prejudice fair competition between suppliers.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XVIII

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XX. Article XIX     back to top

A. Text of Article XIX

Article XIX: Information and Review as Regards Obligations of Parties

1.      Each Party shall promptly publish any law, regulation, judicial decision, administrative ruling of general application, and any procedure (including standard contract clauses) regarding government procurement covered by this Agreement, in the appropriate publications listed in Appendix IV and in such a manner as to enable other Parties and suppliers to become acquainted with them. Each Party shall be prepared, upon request, to explain to any other Party its government procurement procedures.

2.      The government of an unsuccessful tenderer which is a Party to this Agreement may seek, without prejudice to the provisions under Article XXII, such additional information on the contract award as may be necessary to ensure that the procurement was made fairly and impartially. To this end, the procuring government shall provide information on both the characteristics and relative advantages of the winning tender and the contract price. Normally this latter information may be disclosed by the government of the unsuccessful tenderer provided it exercises this right with discretion. In cases where release of this information would prejudice competition in future tenders, this information shall not be disclosed except after consultation with and agreement of the Party which gave the information to the government of the unsuccessful tenderer.

3.      Available information concerning procurement by covered entities and their individual contract awards shall be provided, upon request, to any other Party.

4.      Confidential information provided to any Party which would impede law enforcement or otherwise be contrary to the public interest or would prejudice the legitimate commercial interest of particular enterprises, public or private, or might prejudice fair competition between suppliers shall not be revealed without formal authorization from the party providing the information.

5.      Each Party shall collect and provide to the Committee on an annual basis statistics on its procurements covered by this Agreement. Such reports shall contain the following information with respect to contracts awarded by all procurement entities covered under this Agreement:

(a)      for entities in Annex 1, statistics on the estimated value of contracts awarded, both above and below the threshold value, on a global basis and broken down by entities; for entities in Annexes 2 and 3, statistics on the estimated value of contracts awarded above the threshold value on a global basis and broken down by categories of entities;

(b)      for entities in Annex 1, statistics on the number and total value of contracts awarded above the threshold value, broken down by entities and categories of products and services according to uniform classification systems; for entities in Annexes 2 and 3, statistics on the estimated value of contracts awarded above the threshold value broken down by categories of entities and categories of products and services;

(c)      for entities in Annex 1, statistics, broken down by entity and by categories of products and services, on the number and total value of contracts awarded under each of the cases of Article XV; for categories of entities in Annexes 2 and 3, statistics on the total value of contracts awarded above the threshold value under each of the cases of Article XV; and

(d)      for entities in Annex 1, statistics, broken down by entities, on the number and total value of contracts awarded under derogations to the Agreement contained in the relevant Annexes; for categories of entities in Annexes 2 and 3, statistics on the total value of contracts awarded under derogations to the Agreement contained in the relevant Annexes.

To the extent that such information is available, each Party shall provide statistics on the country of origin of products and services purchased by its entities. With a view to ensuring that such statistics are comparable, the Committee shall provide guidance on methods to be used. With a view to ensuring effective monitoring of procurement covered by this Agreement, the Committee may decide unanimously to modify the requirements of subparagraphs (a) through (d) as regards the nature and the extent of statistical information to be provided and the breakdowns and classifications to be used.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XIX

1. Article XIX:5

5.      At its meeting of 27 February 1996, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted the recommendation of the Statistical Working Group that the rules of origin used for the purposes of statistical reporting in Article XIX:5 of the Agreement should be the same as those applied under Article IV, which are those used in the normal course of trade.(6)

6.      At its meeting of 4 June 1996, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted the product classification system of 26 product categories as proposed by the Chairman.(7) The Committee on Government Procurement also adopted the services classification system as proposed by the Chairman,(8) as amended by merging category 71 and 73 into one category named “transport services”.(9)

XXI. Article XX     back to top

A. Text of Article XX

Article XX: Challenge Procedures

Consultations

1.      In the event of a complaint by a supplier that there has been a breach of this Agreement in the context of a procurement, each Party shall encourage the supplier to seek resolution of its complaint in consultation with the procuring entity. In such instances the procuring entity shall accord impartial and timely consideration to any such complaint, in a manner that is not prejudicial to obtaining corrective measures under the challenge system.

Challenge

2.      Each Party shall provide non-discriminatory, timely, transparent and effective procedures enabling suppliers to challenge alleged breaches of the Agreement arising in the context of procurements in which they have, or have had, an interest.

3.      Each Party shall provide its challenge procedures in writing and make them generally available.

4.      Each Party shall ensure that documentation relating to all aspects of the process concerning procurements covered by this Agreement shall be retained for three years.

5.      The interested supplier may be required to initiate a challenge procedure and notify the procuring entity within specified time-limits from the time when the basis of the complaint is known or reasonably should have been known, but in no case within a period of less than 10 days.

6.      Challenges shall be heard by a court or by an impartial and independent review body with no interest in the outcome of the procurement and the members of which are secure from external influence during the term of appointment. A review body which is not a court shall either be subject to judicial review or shall have procedures which provide that:

(a)      participants can be heard before an opinion is given or a decision is reached;

(b)      participants can be represented and accompanied;

(c)      participants shall have access to all proceedings;

(d)      proceedings can take place in public;

(e)      opinions or decisions are given in writing with a statement describing the basis for the opinions or decisions;

(f)      witnesses can be presented;

(g)      documents are disclosed to the review body.

7.      Challenge procedures shall provide for:

(a)      rapid interim measures to correct breaches of the Agreement and to preserve commercial opportunities. Such action may result in suspension of the procurement process. However, procedures may provide that overriding adverse consequences for the interests concerned, including the public interest, may be taken into account in deciding whether such measures should be applied. In such circumstances, just cause for not acting shall be provided in writing;

(b)      an assessment and a possibility for a decision on the justification of the challenge;

(c)      correction of the breach of the Agreement or compensation for the loss or damages suffered, which may be limited to costs for tender preparation or protest.

8.      With a view to the preservation of the commercial and other interests involved, the challenge procedure shall normally be completed in a timely fashion.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XX

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XXII. Article XXI     back to top

A. Text of Article XXI

Article XXI: Institutions

1.      A Committee on Government Procurement composed of representatives from each of the Parties shall be established. This Committee shall elect its own Chairman and Vice-Chairman and shall meet as necessary but not less than once a year for the purpose of affording Parties the opportunity to consult on any matters relating to the operation of this Agreement or the furtherance of its objectives, and to carry out such other responsibilities as may be assigned to it by the Parties.

2.      The Committee may establish working parties or other subsidiary bodies which shall carry out such functions as may be given to them by the Committee.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXI

1. Article XXI:1

7.      At its meeting of 27 February 1996, the Committee on Government Procurement approved recommendations for decisions adopted by the Interim Committee(10) on Procedures on the Participation of Observers.(11)

8.      At its meeting of 27 February 1996, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted interim procedures on the circulation of documents and on the derestriction of documents, pending definitive measures.(12) Subsequently, at its meeting of 24 February 1997, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted revised procedures with respect to circulation and derestriction of documents.(13) At its meeting of 8 October 2002, the Committee agreed to the revision of that Decision on Circulation and Derestriction of Documents(14) in order to reflect the WTO procedures adopted in the General Council Decision of 14 May 2002 on Procedures for the Circulation and Derestriction of WTO Documents.(15), (16)

XXIII. Article XXII     back to top

A. Text of Article XXII

Article XXII: Consultations and Dispute Settlement

1.      The provisions of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes under the WTO Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Dispute Settlement Understanding”) shall be applicable except as otherwise specifically provided below.

2.      If any Party considers that any benefit accruing to it, directly or indirectly, under this Agreement is being nullified or impaired, or that the attainment of any objective of this Agreement is being impeded as the result of the failure of another Party or Parties to carry out its obligations under this Agreement, or the application by another Party or Parties of any measure, whether or not it conflicts with the provisions of this Agreement, it may, with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory resolution of the matter, make written representations or proposals to the other Party or Parties which it considers to be concerned. Such action shall be promptly notified to the Dispute Settlement Body established under the Dispute Settlement Understanding (hereinafter referred to as “DSB”), as specified below. Any Party thus approached shall give sympathetic consideration to the representations or proposals made to it.

3.      The DSB shall have the authority to establish panels, adopt panel and Appellate Body reports, make recommendations or give rulings on the matter, maintain surveillance of implementation of rulings and recommendations, and authorize suspension of concessions and other obligations under this Agreement or consultations regarding remedies when withdrawal of measures found to be in contravention of the Agreement is not possible, provided that only Members of the WTO Party to this Agreement shall participate in decisions or actions taken by the DSB with respect to disputes under this Agreement.

4.      Panels shall have the following terms of reference unless the parties to the dispute agree otherwise within 20 days of the establishment of the panel:

“To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of this Agreement and of (name of any other covered Agreement cited by the parties to the dispute), the matter referred to the DSB by (name of party) in document … and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in this Agreement.”

In the case of a dispute in which provisions both of this Agreement and of one or more other Agreements listed in Appendix 1 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding are invoked by one of the parties to the dispute, paragraph 3 shall apply only to those parts of the panel report concerning the interpretation and application of this Agreement.

5.      Panels established by the DSB to examine disputes under this Agreement shall include persons qualified in the area of government procurement.

6.      Every effort shall be made to accelerate the proceedings to the greatest extent possible. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 8 and 9 of Article 12 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, the panel shall attempt to provide its final report to the parties to the dispute not later than four months, and in case of delay not later than seven months, after the date on which the composition and terms of reference of the panel are agreed. Consequently, every effort shall be made to reduce also the periods foreseen in paragraph 1 of Article 20 and paragraph 4 of Article 21 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding by two months. Moreover, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 5 of Article 21 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, the panel shall attempt to issue its decision, in case of a disagreement as to the existence or consistency with a covered Agreement of measures taken to comply with the recommendations and rulings, within 60 days.

7.      Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of Article 22 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, any dispute arising under any Agreement listed in Appendix 1 to the Dispute Settlement Understanding other than this Agreement shall not result in the suspension of concessions or other obligations under this Agreement, and any dispute arising under this Agreement shall not result in the suspension of concessions or other obligations under any other Agreement listed in the said Appendix 1.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXII

1. Article XXII:2

(a) Non-violation claim

9.      In Korea — Procurement, the Panel was requested to determine alternatively — if no violation of the Agreement on Government Procurement were found — whether the measures nevertheless nullified or impaired benefits accruing to the United States under the Agreement on Government Procurement, pursuant to Article XXII:2 providing for non-violation claims. The Panel began by noting the general requirements for a “non-violation claim”:

“[N]ormal non-violation cases involve an examination as to whether there is: (1) an application of a measure by a WTO Member; (2) a benefit accruing under the relevant agreement; and (3) nullification or impairment of the benefit due to the application of the measure that could not have been reasonably expected by the exporting Member.”(17)

10.     The Panel on Korea — Procurement then held that the question in the case before it was “whether or not there was a reasonable expectation of an entitlement to a benefit that had accrued pursuant to the negotiation rather than pursuant to a concession”:

“In this case, the United States has asserted that measures it claimed violated the GPA (that is, the imposition of inadequate bid-deadlines; the imposition of certain qualification requirements; the imposition of certain domestic partnering requirements; and the failure to establish effective domestic challenge procedures engaged in by KAA [Korea Airports Authority] and its successors in relation to the IIA [Inchon International Airport] project) to nullify or impair benefits accruing to the United States under the GPA, pursuant to Article XXII:2 of the GPA. A key difference between a traditional non-violation case and the present one would seem to be that, normally, the question of ‘reasonable expectation’ is whether or not it was reasonably to be expected that the benefit under an existing concession would be impaired by the measures. However here, if there is to be a non-violation case, the question is whether or not there was a reasonable expectation of an entitlement to a benefit that had accrued pursuant to the negotiation rather than pursuant to a concession.”(18)

11.     Noting that non-violation is an exceptional concept within the WTO dispute settlement system, stemming from the public international law principle of pacta sunt servanda, the Panel however specified that it was not implying that “a complainant [must] affirmatively prove actual bad faith on the part of another Member”:

“[U]pon occasion, it may be the case that some actions, while permissible under one set of rules (e.g., the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures is a commonly referenced example of rules in this regard), are not consistent with the spirit of other commitments such as those in negotiated Schedules. That is, such actions deny the competitive opportunities which are the reasonably expected effect of such commitments. However, we must also note that, while the overall burden of proof is on the complainant, we do not mean to introduce here a new requirement that a complainant affirmatively prove actual bad faith on the part of another Member. It is fairly clear from the history of disputes prior to the conclusion of the Uruguay Round that such a requirement was never established and there is no evidence in the current treaty text that such a requirement was newly imposed. Rather, the affirmative proof should be that measures have been taken that frustrate the object and purpose of the treaty and the reasonably expected benefits that flow therefrom.” (19)

12.     With reference to the case at hand, the Panel subsequently held that an error in treaty negotiation can also be addressed under Article 26 of the DSU and Article XXII:2 of the Agreement on Government Procurement:

“One of the issues that arises in this dispute is whether the concept of non-violation can arise in contexts other than the traditional approach represented by pacta sunt servanda. Can, for instance the question of error in treaty negotiation be addressed under Article 26 of the DSU and Article XXII:2 of the GPA? We see no reason why it cannot. Parties have an obligation to negotiate in good faith just as they must implement the treaty in good faith. It is clear to us (as discussed in paragraphs 7.110 and 7.121 below) that it is necessary that negotiations in the Agreement before us (the GPA) be conducted on a particularly open and forthcoming basis.

Thus, on the basis of the ample evidence provided by both parties to the dispute, we will review the claim of nullification or impairment raised by the United States within the framework of principles of international law which are generally applicable not only to performance of treaties but also to treaty negotiation.(20) To do otherwise potentially would leave a gap in the applicability of the law generally to WTO disputes and we see no evidence in the language of the WTO Agreements that such a gap was intended. If the non-violation remedy were deemed not to provide a relief for such problems as have arisen in the present case regarding good faith and error in the negotiation of GPA commitments (and one might add, in tariff and services commitments under other WTO Agreements), then nothing could be done about them within the framework of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism if general rules of customary international law on good faith and error in treaty negotiations were ruled not to be applicable.”(21)

13.     After examination of the facts of the case, the Panel on Korea — Procurement found that while Members had a “right to expect full and forthright answers to their questions submitted during negotiations”, they had to protect their own interests “as well”:

“Members have a right to expect full and forthright answers to their questions submitted during negotiations, particularly with respect to Schedules of affirmative commitments such as those appended to the GPA. However, Members must protect their own interests as well and in this case the United States did not do so. It had a significant amount of time to realize, particularly in light of the wide knowledge of KAA’s role, that its understanding of the Korean answer was not accurate. Therefore, we find that, even if the principles of a traditional non-violation case were applicable in this situation the United States has failed to carry its burden of proof to establish that it had reasonable expectations that a benefit had accrued.”(22)

14.     With regard to the possible error in treaty formation, the Panel held that it would consider “whether the United States was induced into error about a fact or situation which it assumed existed in relation to the agreement being negotiated regarding Korea’s accession to the GPA”:

“[W]e […] first recall our finding that there is a particular duty of transparency and openness on the ‘offering’ party in negotiations on concessions under the GPA. The negotiations between the Parties under the GPA do not benefit from a generally accepted framework such as the Harmonized System with respect to goods or even the Central Product Classification in services. The Annexes to the GPA which contain the entities whose procurement is covered by the Agreement are basically self styled Schedules whose interpretation may require extensive knowledge of another country’s procurement systems and governmental organization. Therefore, we believe that transparency and forthright provision of all relevant information are of the essence in negotiations on GPA Schedules.

In our view, as discussed fully in the previous section, Korea’s response to the US question was not as forthright as it should have been. Indeed, the response could be characterized as at best incomplete in light of existing Korean legislation and ongoing plans for further legislation. However, when addressing this problem, rather than asking whether there was a nullification or impairment of expectations arising from a concession, it might be better to inquire as to whether the United States was induced into error about a fact or situation which it assumed existed in relation to the agreement being negotiated regarding Korea’s accession to the GPA. In this case, it clearly appears that the United States was in error when it assumed that the IIA project was covered by the GPA as a result of the entity coverage offered by Korea.”(23)

15.     The Panel noted that Article 48(1) of the Vienna Convention provides that “[a] State may invoke an error in a treaty as invalidating its consent to be bound by the treaty if the error related to a fact or situation which was assumed by that State to exist at the time when the treaty was concluded and formed an essential basis of its consent to be bound by the treaty”. The Panel then went on to recall that, in the course of the negotiations on the Annexes to the Agreement on Government Procurement:

“[T]he United States believed that the IIA project was covered. As we have found in section VII:B of these Findings, that was not correct. The IIA project procurement was the responsibility of a non-covered entity. Hence the US error related to a fact or situation which was assumed by the US to exist at the time when the treaty was concluded. In our view, it also appears from the behaviour of the United States that this purported concession arguably formed an essential basis of its consent to be bound by the treaty as finally agreed. Hence the initial conditions for error under Article 48(1) of the Vienna Convention seem to us to be satisfied.”(24)

16.     After making the finding referenced in paragraph 15 above, the Panel then turned to the second paragraph of Article 48, which states that “Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the State in question contributed by its own conduct to the error or if the circumstances were such as to put that State on notice of a possible error.” The Panel ultimately found that the United States error was not excusable:

“This raises the question of whether the exclusionary clause of the second paragraph of Article 48 can be overcome. Although we have indicated above that the duty to demonstrate good faith and transparency in GPA negotiations is particularly strong for the ‘offering’ party, this does not relieve the other negotiating partners from their duty of diligence to verify these offers as best as they can. Here again the facts already recounted in the previous sub-section demonstrate that the United States has not properly discharged this burden. We do not think the evidence at all supports a finding that the United States has contributed by its own conduct to the error, but given the elements mentioned earlier (such as the two and a half year interval between Korea’s answer to the US question and its final offer, the actions by the European Community in respect of Korea’s offer, the subsequent four month period, of which at least one month was explicitly designated for verification, etc.), we conclude that the circumstances were such as to put the United States on notice of a possible error. Hence the error should not have subsisted at the end of the two and a half year gap, at the moment the accession of Korea was ‘concluded.’ Therefore, the error was no longer ‘excusable’ and only an excusable error can qualify as an error which may vitiate the consent to be bound by the agreement.”(25)

17.     The following table lists the dispute in which a panel report has been adopted where the provisions of the Agreement on Government Procurement were invoked:

XXIV. Article XXIII     back to top

A. Text of Article XXIII

Article XXIII: Exceptions to the Agreement

1.      Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent any Party from taking any action or not disclosing any information which it considers necessary for the protection of its essential security interests relating to the procurement of arms, ammunition or war materials, or to procurement indispensable for national security or for national defence purposes.

2.      Subject to the requirement that such measures are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail or a disguised restriction on international trade, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent any Party from imposing or enforcing measures: necessary to protect public morals, order or safety, human, animal or plant life or health or intellectual property; or relating to the products or services of handicapped persons, of philanthropic institutions or of prison labour.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXIII

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XXV. Article XXIV     back to top

A. Text of Article XXIV

Article XXIV: Final Provisions

1.      Acceptance and Entry into Force

          This Agreement shall enter into force on 1 January 1996 for those governments(8) whose agreed coverage is contained in Annexes 1 through 5 of Appendix I of this Agreement and which have, by signature, accepted the Agreement on 15 April 1994 or have, by that date, signed the Agreement subject to ratification and subsequently ratified the Agreement before 1 January 1996.

(footnote original) 8 For the purpose of this Agreement, the term “government” is deemed to include the competent authorities of the European Communities.

2.      Accession

          Any government which is a Member of the WTO, or prior to the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement which is a contracting party to GATT 1947, and which is not a Party to this Agreement may accede to this Agreement on terms to be agreed between that government and the Parties. Accession shall take place by deposit with the Director-General of the WTO of an instrument of accession which states the terms so agreed. The Agreement shall enter into force for an acceding government on the 30th day following the date of its accession to the Agreement.(26)

3.      Transitional Arrangements

(a)      Hong Kong and Korea may delay application of the provisions of this Agreement, except Articles XXI and XXII, to a date not later than 1 January 1997. The commencement date of their application of the provisions, if prior to 1 January 1997, shall be notified to the Director-General of the WTO 30 days in advance.

(b)      During the period between the date of entry into force of this Agreement and the date of its application by Hong Kong, the rights and obligations between Hong Kong and all other Parties to this Agreement which were on 15 April 1994 Parties to the Agreement on Government Procurement done at Geneva on 12 April 1979 as amended on 2 February 1987 (the “1988 Agreement”) shall be governed by the substantive(9) provisions of the 1988 Agreement, including its Annexes as modified or rectified, which provisions are incorporated herein by reference for that purpose and shall remain in force until 31 December 1996.

(footnote original) 9 All provisions of the 1988 Agreement except the Preamble, Article VII and Article IX other than paragraphs 5(a) and (b) and paragraph 10.

(c)      Between Parties to this Agreement which are also Parties to the 1988 Agreement, the rights and obligations of this Agreement shall supersede those under the 1988 Agreement.

(d)      Article XXII shall not enter into force until the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement. Until such time, the provisions of Article VII\ of the 1988 Agreement shall apply to consultations and dispute settlement under this Agreement, which provisions are hereby incorporated in the Agreement by reference for that purpose. These provisions shall be applied under the auspices of the Committee under this Agreement.

(e)      Prior to the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement, references to WTO bodies shall be construed as referring to the corresponding GATT body and references to the Director-General of the WTO and to the WTO Secretariat shall be construed as references to, respectively, the Director-General to the CONTRACTING PARTIES to GATT 1947 and to the GATT Secretariat.

4.      Reservations

          Reservations may not be entered in respect of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

5.      National Legislation

(a)      Each government accepting or acceding to this Agreement shall ensure, not later than the date of entry into force of this Agreement for it, the conformity of its laws, regulations and administrative procedures, and the rules, procedures and practices applied by the entities contained in its lists annexed hereto, with the provisions of this Agreement.

(b)      Each Party shall inform the Committee of any changes in its laws and regulations relevant to this Agreement and in the administration of such laws and regulations.

6.      Rectifications or Modifications

(a)      Rectifications, transfers of an entity from one Annex to another or, in exceptional cases, other modifications relating to Appendices I through IV shall be notified to the Committee, along with information as to the likely consequences of the change for the mutually agreed coverage provided in this Agreement. If the rectifications, transfers or other modifications are of a purely formal or minor nature, they shall become effective provided there is no objection within 30 days. In other cases, the Chairman of the Committee shall promptly convene a meeting of the Committee. The Committee shall consider the proposal and any claim for compensatory adjustments, with a view to maintaining a balance of rights and obligations and a comparable level of mutually agreed coverage provided in this Agreement prior to such notification. In the event of agreement not being reached, the matter may be pursued in accordance with the provisions contained in Article XXII.

(b)      Where a Party wishes, in exercise of its rights, to withdraw an entity from Appendix I on the grounds that government control or influence over it has been effectively eliminated, that Party shall notify the Committee. Such modification shall become effective the day after the end of the following meeting of the Committee, provided that the meeting is no sooner than 30 days from the date of notification and no objection has been made. In the event of an objection, the matter may be pursued in accordance with the procedures on consultations and dispute settlement contained in Article XXII. In considering the proposed modification to Appendix I and any consequential compensatory adjustment, allowance shall be made for the market opening effects of the removal of government control or influence.

7.      Reviews, Negotiations and Future Work

(a)      The Committee shall review annually the implementation and operation of this Agreement taking into account the objectives thereof. The Committee shall annually inform the General Council of the WTO of developments during the periods covered by such reviews.

(b)      Not later than the end of the third year from the date of entry into force of this Agreement and periodically thereafter, the Parties thereto shall undertake further negotiations, with a view to improving this Agreement and achieving the greatest possible extension of its coverage among all Parties on the basis of mutual reciprocity, having regard to the provisions of Article V relating to developing countries.

(c)      Parties shall seek to avoid introducing or prolonging discriminatory measures and practices which distort open procurement and shall, in the context of negotiations under subparagraph (b), seek to eliminate those which remain on the date of entry into force of this Agreement.

8.      Information Technology

          With a view to ensuring that the Agreement does not constitute an unnecessary obstacle to technical progress, Parties shall consult regularly in the Committee regarding developments in the use of information technology in government procurement and shall, if necessary, negotiate modifications to the Agreement. These consultations shall in particular aim to ensure that the use of information technology promotes the aims of open, non-discriminatory and efficient government procurement through transparent procedures, that contracts covered under the Agreement are clearly identified and that all available information relating to a particular contract can be identified. When a Party intends to innovate, it shall endeavour to take into account the views expressed by other Parties regarding any potential problems.

9.      Amendments

          Parties may amend this Agreement having regard, inter alia, to the experience gained in its implementation. Such an amendment, once the Parties have concurred in accordance with the procedures established by the Committee, shall not enter into force for any Party until it has been accepted by such Party.

10.     Withdrawal

(a)      Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement. The withdrawal shall take effect upon the expiration of 60 days from the date on which written notice of withdrawal is received by the Director-General of the WTO. Any Party may upon such notification request an immediate meeting of the Committee.

(b)      If a Party to this Agreement does not become a Member of the WTO within one year of the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement or ceases to be a Member of the WTO, it shall cease to be a Party to this Agreement with effect from the same date.

11.     Non-application of this Agreement between Particular Parties

          This Agreement shall not apply as between any two Parties if either of the Parties, at the time either accepts or accedes to this Agreement, does not consent to such application.

12.     Notes, (27) Appendices and Annexes

          The Notes, Appendices and Annexes to this Agreement constitute an integral part thereof.

13.     Secretariat

          This Agreement shall be serviced by the WTO Secretariat.

14.     Deposit

          This Agreement shall be deposited with the Director-General of the WTO, who shall promptly furnish to each Party a certified true copy of this Agreement, of each rectification or modification thereto pursuant to paragraph 6 and of each amendment thereto pursuant to paragraph 9, and a notification of each acceptance thereof or accession thereto pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 and of each withdrawal therefrom pursuant to paragraph 10 of this Article.

15.     Registration

          This Agreement shall be registered in accordance with the provisions of Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.

          Done at Marrakesh this fifteenth day of April one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four in a single copy, in the English, French and Spanish languages, each text being authentic, except as otherwise specified with respect to the Appendices hereto.

B. Interpretation and Application of Article XXIV

1. Article XXIV:2

18.     At its meeting of 27 February 1996, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted the Procedures for Accession to the Agreement.(28)

19.     In June 2000, with respect to the process of accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted a Checklist of issues for the provision of information by applicant governments.(29) By way of streamlining the accession process, the Committee agreed to an Indicative Time-frame for Accession Negotiations and Arrangements for Reporting on the Progress of Work in document GPA/W/109/Rev.2.(30)

2. Article XXIV:3

20.     At its meetings of 18 February and 25 June 1998, the Committee on Government Procurement discussed the legal and procedural aspects of the relationship of the Tokyo Round Agreement on Government Procurement to the 1994 Agreement on Government Procurement on the basis of a Note prepared by the Secretariat in response to the Committee’s request.(31)

3. Article XXIV:5

21.     At its meeting on 4 June 1996, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted the Procedures for the Notification of National Implementing Legislation.(32)

4. Article XXIV:6

22.     In accordance with the procedures established by the Committee on Government Procurement at its meeting of 24 February 1997,(33) parties proposing to make rectifications and modifications to their appendices should notify them to the Committee in the form of relevant replacement or additional pages identifying the proposed changes to be inserted in the loose-leaf system for the Appendices to the Agreement that was established by the Committee at that time.(34)

23.     At its meeting of 23 April 2004, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted a Decision Pursuant to Article XXIV:6(a) of the Agreement on Government Procurement,(35) approving the modification to the Appendices of the European Communities proposed in document GPA/MOD/EEC/1. This modification resulted in the extension of coverage under the Agreement on Government Procurement to the ten new member States of the European Communities, i.e. Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Following the adoption of that decision, the European Communities made a statement clarifying the content of its modifications made in view of its enlargement.(36) The decision entered into force on 1 May 2004, on the same date as the enlargement of the European Communities to include the above countries.

24.     At its meeting of 16 December 2004, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted a Decision pursuant to Article XXIV:6(a) of the Agreement on Government Procurement.(37) The Decision allows Israel to extend by one year the period to reduce its offsets from 30 to 20 per cent. Under its previous Note to Appendix I of the Agreement, Israel was authorized to require offsets in any form up to 30 per cent of the value of a contract until the end of 2004, and should have further reduced this level to 20 per cent of the value of a contract as of 1 January 2005. Based on Israel’s proposed modification to its Note to Appendix I,(38) and subsequent informal consultations with other parties, a draft Decision was submitted to, and adopted by, the Committee without further discussion. According to this Decision, Israel may extend by one year the period to reduce its offsets to 20 per cent, and shall submit a report concerning the implementation of its modified Note to Appendix I at the end of 2005.

5. Article XXIV:7

25.     Pursuant to Article XXIV:7(a) of the Agreement on Government Procurement, the Committee adopted Annual Reports to the General Council for each year since the entry into force of the Government Procurement Agreement of 1994. These reports are available in the following documents: GPA/8 and GPA/8/Add.1 for 1996;(39) GPA/19 for 1997;(40) GPA/25 for 1998;(41) GPA/30 for 1999;(42) GPA/44 for 2000;(43) GPA/58 for 2001;(44) GPA/73 for 2002;(45) and GPA/75 for November 2002 to June 2003.

26.     Pursuant to Article XXIV:7(b) and (c) of the Agreement, the Parties to the Agreement have undertaken further negotiations under the Agreement on Government Procurement. Further information on the negotiations undertaken so far on the non-market access related provisions in the text of the Agreement can be found in the above reports. At its meeting of 16 July 2004, the Committee on Government Procurement adopted a Decision on Modalities for the Negotiations on Extension of Coverage and Elimination of Discriminatory Measures and Practices.(46) According to this decision, the Committee as a whole will address the provisions in the draft revised text of the Agreement referred to as “market access issues”, as well as issues relating to the presentation and structure of the appendices to the Agreement. At the same time, negotiations on the extension of coverage of each Party’s Appendix I as well as on the elimination of discriminatory measures and practices in such Appendices will be largely pursued bilaterally but subject to monitoring by the Committee as a whole. The decision sets the aim that Parties conclude the overall re-negotiation of the Agreement pursuant to Article XXIV:7(b) and (c) by the beginning of 2006.

XXVI. Appendix I     back to top

A. Central Government Entities

27.     The Panel on Korea — Procurement examined whether several entities concerned at successive stages with the procurement of airport construction in Korea, specifically the Korean Airport Construction Authority (KOACA), Korea Airports Authority (KAA) and the Inchon International Airport Corporation (IIAC) were within the scope of Korea’s list of “central government entities” as specified in Annex 1 of Korea’s obligations in Appendix I of the Agreement on Government Procurement. The United States contended that the practices of these entities were inconsistent with Korea’s obligations under the Agreement on Government Procurement. In this regard, the Panel noted:

“A critical question we must first address is determining what is explicitly contained in Korea’s Schedule. A preliminary issue is the status of Note 1 to Annex 1, in particular the extent to which Parties can qualify the coverage of listed entities through such Notes. In our view, Members determine, pursuant to negotiation, the scope of the coverage of their commitments as expressed in the Schedules. In this regard, we take note of the panel finding in United States — Restrictions on Imports of Sugar (‘United States — Sugar’) wherein the panel observed that Headnotes could be used to qualify the tariff concessions themselves.”(47)

28.     Accordingly, the Panel noted that:

“[T]he first step of the analysis, therefore, will be to examine Korea’s Schedule and determine whether, within the ordinary meaning of the terms therein, the entity responsible for Inchon International Airport (IIA) procurement is covered. This will include a review of all relevant Annexes and Notes.”(48)

29.     In light of the fact that the Ministry of Construction and Transportation (“MOCT”) was included in the list of central government entities in Annex 1 to Korea’s Schedule, the Panel went on to consider whether “there exists the possibility of the inclusion of certain procurements of an entity which is not listed, due to its relationship with a listed entity”:

“[T]here is a remaining question as to whether there exists the possibility of the inclusion of certain procurements of an entity which is not listed, due to its relationship with a listed entity. These arguably are general issues which arise with respect to any Member’s Schedule regardless of the structure and content of the Schedule and any qualifying Notes.”(49)

30.     The Panel eventually rejected the United States’ argument that KAA could be considered a part of MOCT because it was controlled, at least for the purposes of the IIA project, by MOCT. The Panel noted in this respect that:

“There is no use of the term ‘direct control’ or even ‘control’ in the sense that the United States wishes to use it. It has not been defined in this manner either in the context used in the Tokyo Round Agreement or elsewhere. We cannot agree with the overall US position that a ‘control’ test should be read into the GPA. However, we also do not think that it is an entirely irrelevant question. We think the issue of ‘control’ of one entity over another can be a relevant criterion among others for determining coverage of the GPA, as discussed below.

…

[W]e do believe that entities that are not listed in an Annex 1 to the GPA whether in the Annex list or through a Note to the Annex, can, nevertheless, be covered under the GPA. We believe that this flows from the fact that an overly narrow interpretation of ‘central government entity’ may result in less coverage under Annex 1 than was intended by the signatories. On the other hand, an overly broad interpretation of the term may result in coverage of entities that were never intended to be covered by signatories.”(50)

31.     The Panel on Korea — Procurement then put forward two criteria for answering the question referenced in paragraph 29 above:

“In the present case, our view is that the relevant questions are: (1) Whether an entity (KAA, in this case) is essentially a part of a listed central government entity (MOCT) — in other words, are the entities legally unified? and (2) Whether KAA and its successors have been acting on behalf of MOCT. The first test is appropriate because if entities that are essentially a part of, or legally unified with, listed central government entities are not considered covered, it could lead to great uncertainty as to what was actually covered because coverage would be dependent on the internal structure of an entity which may be unknown to the other negotiating parties. The second test is appropriate because procurements that are genuinely undertaken on behalf of a listed entity (as, for example, in the case where a principal/agent relationship exists between the listed entity and another entity) should properly be covered under Annex 1 because they would be considered legally as procurements by MOCT. In our view, it would defeat the objectives of the GPA if an entity listed in a signatory’s Schedule could escape the Agreement’s disciplines by commissioning another agency of government, not itself listed in that signatory’s Schedule, to procure on its behalf.”(51)

32.     With respect to the first question, the Panel, persuaded on balance by the indicia of independence of KAA and its successors, found that KAA was not legally unified with or a part of MOCT, basing itself on the following criteria:

“KAA was established by law as an independent juristic entity; it authored and adopted its own by laws; it had its own management and employees who were not government employees; it published bid announcements and requests for proposals of its own accord; it concluded contracts with successful bidders on its own behalf; and it funded portions of the IIA project with its own monies.”(52)

33.     With regard to the question whether or not KAA and its successors were acting on behalf of MOCT, at least with respect to the IIA project (i.e., whether the IIA project was really the legal responsibility of MOCT), the Panel, after having reviewed the laws governing construction of the IIA as well as other factual evidence regarding involvement of MOCT in the IIA project, found that:

“[T]here certainly is a role under Korean law for MOCT in the IIA project. It appears to be a role of oversight. We do not think oversight by one governmental entity of a project which has been delegated by law to another entity (which we have already found to be independent and not covered by GPA commitments) results in a conclusion that there is an agency relationship between them.”(53)

XXVII. Decision on Accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement     back to top

A. Text of the Decision

Decision on Accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement

1.      Ministers invite the Committee on Government Procurement established under the Agreement on Government Procurement in Annex 4(b) of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization to clarify that:

(a)      a Member interested in accession according to paragraph 2 of Article XXIV of the Agreement on Government Procurement would communicate its interest to the Director-General of the WTO, submitting relevant information, including a coverage offer for incorporation in Appendix I having regard to the relevant provisions of the Agreement, in particular Article I and, where appropriate, Article V;

(b)      the communication would be circulated to Parties to the Agreement;

(c)      the Member interested in accession would hold consultations with the Parties on the terms for its accession to the Agreement;

(d)      with a view to facilitating accession, the Committee would establish a working party if the Member in question, or any of the Parties to the Agreement, so requests. The working party should examine: (i) the coverage offer made by the applicant Member; and (ii) relevant information pertaining to export opportunities in the markets of the Parties, taking into account the existing and potential export capabilities of the applicant Member and export opportunities for the Parties in the market of the applicant Member;

(e)      upon a decision by the Committee agreeing to the terms of accession including the coverage lists of the acceding Member, the acceding Member would deposit with the Director-General of the WTO an instrument of accession which states the terms so agreed. The acceding Member’s coverage lists in English, French and Spanish would be appended to the Agreement;

(f)      prior to the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement, the above procedures would apply mutatis mutandis to contracting parties to the GATT 1947 interested in accession, and the tasks assigned to the Director-General of the WTO would be carried out by the Director-General to the CONTRACTING PARTIES to the GATT 1947.

2.      It is noted that Committee decisions are arrived at on the basis of consensus. It is also noted that the non-application clause of paragraph 11 of Article XXIV is available to any Party.

B. Interpretation and Application of the Decision

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

XXVIII. Notes     back to top

A. Text of the Notes

NOTES

          The terms ‘country’ or ‘countries’ as used in this Agreement, including the Appendices, are to be understood to include any separate customs territory Party to this Agreement.

          In the case of a separate customs territory Party to this Agreement, where an expression in this Agreement is qualified by the term ‘national’, such expression shall be read as pertaining to that customs territory, unless otherwise specified.

Article 1, paragraph 1

          Having regard to general policy considerations relating to tied aid, including the objective of developing countries with respect to the untying of such aid, this Agreement does not apply to procurement made in furtherance of tied aid to developing countries so long as it is practised by Parties.

B. Interpretation and Application of the Notes

No jurisprudence or decision of a competent WTO body.

Footnotes:

5. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1. back to text
6. GPA/M/1, paras. 56-57. back to text
7. GPA/W/17, Annex 1. back to text
8. GPA/W/17, Annex 2. back to text
9. GPA/M/2, paras. 49-51. back to text
10. Interim Committee on Government Procurement, adopted 25 October 1995, GPA/IC/W/31. back to text
11. GPA/M/1, Section B. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/1, Annex 1. back to text
12. GPA/M/1, Section B. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/1, Annexes 4 and 5. back to text
13. GPA/M/5, Section G. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/1/Add.2. back to text
14. GPA/1/Add.2. back to text
15. WT/L/452. back to text
16. The text of the revised decision adopted by the Committee at its meeting of 8 October 2002 can be found in document GPA/72. back to text
17. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.86. back to text
18. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.87. back to text
19. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.99. back to text
20. (footnote original) We note that DSU Article 7.1 requires that the relevant covered agreement be cited in the request for a panel and reflected in the terms of reference of a panel. That is not a bar to a broader analysis of the type we are following here, for the GPA would be the referenced covered agreement and, in our view, we are merely fully examining the issue of non-violation raised by the United States. We are merely doing it within the broader context of customary international law rather than limiting it to the traditional analysis that accords with the extended concept of pacta sunt servanda. The purpose of the terms of reference is to properly identify the claims of the party and therefore the scope of a panel’s review. We do not see any basis for arguing that the terms of reference are meant to exclude reference to the broader rules of customary international law in interpreting a claim properly before the Panel. back to text
21. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, paras. 7.100-7.101. back to text
22. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.119. back to text
23. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, paras. 7.121-7.122. back to text
24. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.124. back to text
25. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.125. back to text
26. With respect to accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement, in Marrakesh, see the Decision on Accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement, in Section XXVII. back to text
27. For the Notes, see Section XXVIII. back to text
28. GPA/M/1, Section B. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/1, Annex 2. back to text
29. GPA/M/13, Section G, and GPA/M/14, Section C. The text of the adopted document can be found in GPA/35. back to text
30. GPA/58, para. 22 and GPA/M/15, paras. 15-16. back to text
31. GPA/M/8, Section C and GPA/M/9, Section B. back to text
32. GPA/M/2, para.7. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/1/Add.1. back to text
33. GPA/M/5, Section D. See also GPA/W/35/Rev.1, para. 4. back to text
34. These proposals and any supplementary documents relating to them are circulated in the GPA/MOD/- document series (formerly in the GPA/W/- series). Once a proposal has been approved, the new or amended page(s) is certified in a WT/Let/- document and the relevant documentation derestricted. An up-to-date electronic copy of the loose-leaf system is available on the WTO website (www.wto.org). back to text
35. GPA/M/22, paras. 14-28. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/78. back to text
36. GPA/M/22, para. 17, including the text of the statement. back to text
37. GPA/M/25, paras. 2-3. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/83. back to text
38. GPA/MOD/ISR/1. back to text
39. GPA/M/3, para. 42. back to text
40. GPA/M/7, para. 29. back to text
41. GPA/M/10, para. 24. back to text
42. GPA/M/12, para. 34. back to text
43. GPA/M/14, para. 42. back to text
44. GPA/M/16, para. 55. back to text
45. GPA/M/19, para. 62. back to text
46. GPA/M/23, paras. 2-6. The text of the decision can be found in GPA/79. back to text
47. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.30. back to text
48. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.12. back to text
49. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.49. back to text
50. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, paras. 7.57-7.58. back to text
51. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.59. back to text
52. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.60. back to text
53. Panel Report on Korea — Procurement, para. 7.70. back to text