
Mr. Ruggiero went on to outline the progress that the WTO
has been making in Geneva in terms of increasing
transparency and improving the dialogue with civil
society. He emphasized that this process has benefitted
greatly from the constructive engagement and contribution
by the NGO community and that this demonstrates, more
than anything, that the WTO and civil society to a very
large degree share the same concerns and objectives.First,
the WTO Secretariat now holds regular briefings for NGOs
on specific meetings of the WTO. These briefings attract
a good attendance from all segments of civil society and
have proved to be useful for an open and frank discussion
on all activities of the WTO.
Second,
a new NGO Section on the WTO Web site has been
inaugurated and provides a useful and more direct forum
for NGO input. This new feature on the WTO Web site is
working well, but the WTO would certainly welcome ideas
and suggestions on how to improve it.
Third,
a list of all WTO related position papers received by the
WTO Secretariat is circulated to Members on a monthly
basis. Judging by the demand for full copies of these
position papers, interest among delegations and in
capitals has been encouraging.
Fourth,
and very significantly for the NGO community, the issue
of amicus briefs to Panels was addressed in the ruling of
the Appellate Body on Shrimps and Sea-turtles. It is now
clear that panels should accept amicus briefs and then
decide how to treat this information
Mr.
Ruggiero stressed that these measures have already been
implemented and that the WTO Secretariat continuously
looks for ways to improve them. He went on to address a
number of other issues where work is in progress in
Geneva.
First,
the issue of more rapid de-restriction of all WTO
documents is currently being discussed by Members and
several interesting ideas have been floated. There is
little doubt that the WTO gradually is moving towards
faster, more automatic and more complete de-restriction
of documents. To the extent that some documents remain
restricted for six months it reflects the fact that they
contain negotiating positions which are not yet
completely adopted.
Second,
the US proposal for earlier publication of panel reports
is receiving considerable attention in Geneva.
Essentially, the US proposal aims to ensure that once a
Panel has produced its final report, the findings and the
conclusions will be translated immediately. This would
shorten the publication time of the report considerably.
Third,
further consultations on how to improve the relationship
between the WTO and civil society are being actively
pursued in Geneva. President Clinton has suggested that
prior to the next Ministerial Conference of the WTO a
meeting with civil society could take place. Establishing
a more regular consultative process could be useful in
terms of this initiative.
Finally,
considerable progress has been made on the High Level
Symposia on Trade and Environment and on Trade and
Development to be held in mid-March. These meetings will
be the first time that representatives from civil society
will sit around the same table as senior officials from
governments, inter-governmental organizations and
academics. The meetings will also send a strong signal
that the WTO is open to environment and development
objectives.
In
terms of improving the dialogue between the WTO and civil
society and building confidence the significance of these
events cannot be overestimated. Confidence building
remains a crucial challenge and much work has to be done
to improve relations among governments and the
development and environment communities.
Mr.
Ruggiero concluded by emphasizing the need for
cooperation among the different stakeholders in the areas
of trade, environment and development. He pointed to the
importance of an open, constructive and, above all,
inclusive exchange of views in these areas and reminded
the representatives of civil society that many of the
impressive achievements in the area of transparency are
also a result of the constructive work of the NGO
community.
|