|
See also:
> More
on the DDA
> Developmental
aspects of the DDA
|
“The majority of WTO Members are
developing countries. We seek to place their needs and interests at
the heart of the Work Programme adopted in this Declaration”
Doha Ministerial Declaration, November
2001 A
fundamental aspect of the Doha Round of negotiations is that it
addresses some of the imbalances in trade rules that have hindered
developing country exports. This is to ensure that the rules under
consideration provide developing countries with real market
opportunities and accordingly opportunities to enhance their
development and growth prospects. The development dimension permeates
all negotiating areas. When the Doha Round is concluded, the
multilateral trading system will be more open — particularly for
developing countries’ exports — and will have a strengthened
rule-making structure that will be more balanced, especially towards
developing country interests and concerns. There is, therefore, a
clear connection between concluding the DDA negotiations and bringing
about MDG 8.
The official MDG indicators, developed to
assess progress towards achieving the goals, spell out the importance
of increased market access in meeting the needs of developing and
least-developed countries. These include: 1) increased duty-free
access for developing countries, 2) tariff reduction (especially on
agricultural products, textiles and clothing) and 3) the reduction of
trade-distorting subsidies from developed countries. All of these
elements are part of the WTO agreements and are subject to
negotiations. A successful conclusion of the Doha Round would
therefore go a long way in addressing developing country needs and
contribute significantly to the achievement of MDG 8.
A successful conclusion of the Doha Round would address developing
country needs and contribute significantly to the achievement of MDG 8
Concluding the Doha Development Round would
address the trade distortions which plague the agriculture sector to
the detriment of developing countries, many of which enjoy a
comparative advantage in this sector. The MDGs also recognize the
agricultural sector as an important area where progress towards
development can be made. A more open agricultural sector would also
allow for the diversification of agricultural production in developing
countries. A decision taken by WTO members to provide duty-free and
quota-free market access to products from LDCs (see Box 1) will be
beneficial to those countries.
The agricultural sector has traditionally
been a highly protected sector in many countries. While agriculture
makes a significant contribution to the economies of a large number of
developing countries, many of the world’s agricultural producers are
disadvantaged in the world trading environment because of high tariff
barriers and competition from producers — particularly in developed
countries — that receive high levels of domestic or export-related
support. Already prior to the launching of the Doha Round, WTO members
had committed themselves to the long-term objective of establishing a
fair and market-oriented trading system for agricultural products. The
Doha Round strengthened this resolve by allowing for continued
negotiations between members to achieve this objective. In the context
of the Doha Round, tariff barriers and trade-distorting domestic
support in agriculture will be substantially cut. Furthermore, WTO
members have agreed as part of the overall package to eliminate
agricultural export subsidies completely.
Important market access opportunities can
similarly be expected for developing countries in the nonagricultural
area. Trade in industrial products accounts for more than 90 per cent
of world trade in goods and encompasses some key products of export
interest to many developing countries. Thanks to previous rounds of
trade negotiations, tariffs in developed countries on industrial
products are today on average relatively low. However, this average
often hides remaining high tariffs on products in which developing
countries have a particular stake. A reduction in tariffs and
non-tariff barriers to industrial trade would thus provide important
export possibilities for developing countries. In fact, the mandate
for the industrial negotiations specifically calls for the reduction
or elimination of trade barriers on products of export interest to
developing countries. As with agriculture, LDCs will reap additional
benefits in the industrial area from the duty-free and quota-free
market access decision (see Box 1).
|
Box 1:
Duty-free and quota-free market access for LDCs
Duty-free and quota-free (DFQF) market
access for products originating in LDCs has been a long-standing
aspiration of LDCs in the multilateral trading system and is a
shared objective of the international community as expressed in
the Millennium Development Goals. WTO members at the launch of the
Doha Round in November 2001 committed themselves to the objective
of providing DFQF market access to LDC products. Building on this
commitment, in December 2005, at the WTO’s Sixth Ministerial
Conference in Hong Kong, China, they agreed that developed country
members of the WTO would provide DFQF market access for at least
97 per cent of products originating from LDCs. Developing country
members, within their capacity, were also invited to provide DFQF
market access for LDCs’ products.
While most developed country members have already met the 97 per
cent threshold of providing DFQF market access to products
originating from LDCs, a significant benefit to LDCs from the
conclusion of the Doha Round will be that all developed country
members will be required to take on this commitment. This
contributes directly to the achievement of MDG 8 by increasing the
“proportion of total developed country imports from developing
countries and least developed countries, admitted free of duty”.
Furthermore, some developing members have also undertaken
initiatives to provide DFQF access for LDCs. Given the growing
importance of developing market destinations for LDC exports,
these initiatives also hold great potential for further expansion
of South-South trade.
Another important element in the Hong Kong Decision concerns
preferential rules of origin, which govern preferential trade
arrangements including tariff concessions. Members stressed the
need to ensure that those rules as “applicable to imports from
LDCs are transparent and simple and contribute to facilitating
market access”. |
Other elements of the Doha Round also
support the achievement of MDG 8. WTO members are simultaneously
working to bring down other obstacles to merchandise trade. The aim of
the Doha Round’s trade facilitation negotiations is to improve the
efficiency of transactions by expediting the movement, release and
clearance of goods across borders, thereby reducing transaction and
transit costs that are particularly important for landlocked
developing countries, while increasing possibilities for small and
medium-sized enterprises to expand and participate more actively in
international trade. The Doha Round also encompasses services.
Services is the dominant economic activity in virtually all countries
of the world, and the opening of services trade can provide many
opportunities to developing countries. Developing countries have
voiced their interest in many services sectors (including professional
services, computer and related services, telecommunication services,
construction and related engineering services, distribution services,
energy services, environmental services, financial services, tourism
services and transport services) and in supplying services through the
various means identified by the WTO, including through the
cross-border supply of services and the temporary movement of
professionals across borders. Negotiations are also advancing to
provide LDC service providers with preferential market access.
The opening of services trade can provide many opportunities to
developing countries
Through further market opening in emerging
economies, the Doha Development Round negotiations will also enhance
the potential for South-South trade, with the resulting benefits to
developing countries. This could be a very significant outcome of the
Doha Round.
Additionally, the Doha Round would
strengthen the multilateral trading system through addressing
fisheries subsidies, which contribute to over-fishing. The
negotiations will also lead to an improvement in the existing rules
against unfair trading practices. Strengthening the regulations
governing the multilateral trading system will benefit all WTO
members, but smaller players in global trade will benefit in
particular, as they will from the fact that the principle of special
and differential treatment (S&D) in favour of developing countries
governs all areas of negotiation in the Doha Round. Finally, the Doha
Round will provide for more certainty in trading arrangements by
securing binding commitments from member countries. Estimates of the
gains to developing countries from a conclusion of the Doha Round are
summarized in Box 2.
In summary, completion of the Doha Round
would be a fundamentally important contribution by the WTO to the
realization of the MDGs. The Doha Round provides a unique opportunity
for the international community to tackle issues in international
trade that cannot be addressed in other forums.
In summary, completion of the Doha Round
would be a fundamentally important contribution of the WTO to the
realization of the MDGs. The Doha Round provides a unique opportunity
for the international community to tackle issues in international
trade that cannot be tackled in other forums.
|
Box 2:
Potential gains to developing countries from the conclusion of the
Doha Round
According to a recent study by Adler et
al. (2009)(1), the trade gains for a sample of
15 developing countries in agriculture, non-agricultural market
access and services are estimated to be US$ 7.8 billion, US$ 38.9
billion and US$ 68.8 billion respectively. Kinman et al. (2007)(2)
show that, in proportion to GDP, trade gains from the conclusion
of the Doha Round are twice as large for developing countries and
three times as large for least-developed countries as they are for
developed countries, with the largest trade surge being trade
between developing countries. Taking into account the effects of
measures such as trade facilitation and the Aid for Trade
initiative, Hoekman and Nicita (2010)(3) show
that a marginal reduction in trade costs can boost the trade
expansion effects of the Doha Round by a factor of two or more. In
addition, Adler et al. (2009) show that the income gains for
developing countries from greater market access and trade
facilitation as a result of the Doha Round amount to 0.3 and 1.5
per cent of GDP respectively. In both cases this is almost double
the percentage increase for developed countries. Finally, Bouet
and Laborde (2010)(4) argue that a failure to
conclude the Doha Round would not only prevent an increase in
world trade, but may also precipitate a worldwide move towards
protectionism that would reduce world trade by US$ 808 billion.
This “preventive” role of the DDA represents the systemic benefits
stemming from the adoption of binding and enforceable commitments.
The authors show that in terms of real income, about two-thirds of
global gains resulting from this “preventive” role accrue to
developing countries. |
|
Notes:
1. Adler, M., Brunel, C., Hufbauer, G.C. and Schott, J.J.
(2009), “What’s on the table? The Doha Round as of August 2009”,
Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper
Series N° WP 09-6.
2. Kinnman, S. and Lodefalk, M. (2007), “What is at stake
in the Doha Round”, The World Economy 30:8, pp. 1305-1325.
3. Hoekman, B. and Nicita, A. (2010), “Assessing the Doha
Round: Market access, transactions costs and Aid for Trade
facilitation”, The Journal of International Trade and
EconomicDevelopment 19:1, pp. 65-79.
4. Bouet, A. and Laborde, D. (2010), “Assessing the
potential cost of a failed Doha Round”, World Trade Review 9:2,
pp. 319-351. |
 |
 |