SUBJECT INDEX BY CASE: APPELLATE BODY REPORTS

G-H

 

Index: A  B  C-D  E-F  G-H  I  J  K-L  M-S  T  U-Z 

ON THIS PAGE:

> Guatemala — Cement I

Guatemala — Cement I (WT/DS60/AB/R)   back to top

AB procedure

dates and deadlines

extension of deadline for submissions of participants/third participants (WP 16(2)) W.2.10.1.2

modification (WP 16(2)) W.2.6.2.1

consultation and dispute settlement (AD 17)

GATT XXII and XXIII compared A.3.55.1

“matter”, referral to DSB (AD 17.4), identification of measure at issue, need for (DSU 6.2), identification as AD duty, acceptance of price undertaking or provisional measure, need for R.2.3.6

special or additional rule and procedure (DSU 1.2 and Appendix 2), whether A.3.55.1, S.5.1–3

legal basis of claim (AD 17)

consultations (AD 17.3) A.3.55.1

GATT XXII and XXIII compared A.3.55.1

specific measures referable to DSB (AD 17.4/DSU 6.2) and claims/legal basis relating to the measures distinguished A.3.56.2

legal basis of claim (DSU 6.2) (request for establishment of panel), summary, sufficiency R.2.1.3

“matter referred to the DSB” (AD 17.4/DSU 7.1) R.2.1.4, T.6.1.5–6

equivalence of meaning in AD 17.4 and DSU 7.1 R.2.1.4, T.6.1.5–6

identification of specific issues and legal basis of claim/complaint as dual requirements (DSU 6.2) R.2.1.3, T.6.1.5–6

“measure at issue” as A.3.56.2–3, T.6.1.5–6

“measure at issue” (DSU 6.2) as A.3.56.1

request for establishment of panel (requirements) (DSU 6.2)

AD requirements (AD 17.5), consistency A.3.57.1, R.2.1.4

writing R.2.1.3

special or additional rules and procedures for dispute settlement (DSU 1.2 and Appendix 2)

AD 17, whether A.3.55.1, S.5.1–3

conflict with DSU provisions, precedence in case of (WTO Annex 1A) S.5.2–3

“specific measure at issue” (AD 17.4/DSU 6.2)

AD “measure” qualifying for DSB proceedings (AD 17.4) A.3.56.2–3

need for identification of specific measures at issue (DSU 6.2) R.2.3.5–6

identification as part of the matter referred to the DSB, need for (AD 17.4/DSU 7.1) A.3.56.1–3, R.2.1.3, R.2.1.4

identification as AD duty, acceptance of price undertaking or provisional measure (AD 17.4), need for R.2.3.6

“specific”, “sufficient to present the problem clearly” R.2.1.3, T.6.1.5

“specific measure at issue” and legal basis of claim distinguished A.3.56.2, R.2.1.3, T.6.1.6

standard/scope of review (AB) (AD 17.6), AD 6.2 requirements, consistency with A.3.57.1, R.2.1.4

terms of reference of panels (DSU 7), as definition of jurisdiction/legal claims at issue, legal claim included in terms of reference, limitation of jurisdiction to T.6.1.5

WTO Agreement, conflict between constituent covered agreements, precedence (WTO Annex 1A) S.5.2–3


The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.