harmonization
of measures (SPS 3)
general rule/exception, relationship (SPS 3.1 and 3.2), whether **B.3**.1.11,
**S.6**.8.1-3
measures based on international standards (SPS 3.1) **S.6**.6
“based on” **S.6**.6.1, **S.6**.6.3
burden of proof
**B.3**.1.11, **S.6**.6.3
measures which conform to international standards (SPS
3.2) **S.6**.7
burden of proof **S.6**.7.1-2
incorporation into
municipal law **S.6**.7.2
presumption of consistency
**S.6**.6.1, **S.6**.6.3,
**S.6**.7.2-5,
**S.6**.20.5
measures resulting in a higher level
of protection (SPS 3.3) and **S.6**.7.5,
**S.6**.20.5,
**S.6**.20.7
measures which result in a higher level of protection (SPS 3.3) **S.6**.8
consistency with other SPS articles including SPS 5.1-8 **S.6**.8.4
Members’ right to choose **S.6**.5.1, **S.6**.5.3
presumption of
consistency and **S.6**.7.5
risk assessment, need for (SPS 3.3,
footnote 2 and SPS 5.1) **S.6**.8.4, **S.6**.9.8
scientific
justification, need for **S.6**.8.4
SPS preamble and **S.6**.8.2
Harmonized
System of Customs Classification
as aid to interpretation of covered agreements **H.1**.1-4,
**H.1**.8, **I.3**.3.6-7,
**N.1**.3.2.2, **T.1**.2.2,
**T.1**.2.9, **T.1**.2.14-15
Chapter Notes
binding effect **H.1**.5
Explanatory Notes distinguished **H.1**.5
“objective characteristics” as basis for classification, “preservation”,
whether **H.1**.6-7
WTO agreements, relationship with **H.1**.3-4,
**H.1**.8, **I.3**.3.6-7,
**T.1**.2.9
**
** |