DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: DISPUTE DS434

Australia — Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging


This summary has been prepared by the Secretariat under its own responsibility. The summary is for general information only and is not intended to affect the rights and obligations of Members.

  

See also:
The basics: how disputes are settled in WTO
Computer based training on dispute settlement
Text of the Dispute Settlement Understanding


Current status  back to top

 

Key facts  back to top

Short title:
Complainant:
Respondent:
Third Parties:
Agreements cited:
(as cited in request for consultations)
Request for Consultations received:

  

Summary of the dispute to date  back to top

The summary below was up-to-date at

Consultations

Complaint by Ukraine. (See also DS435 and DS441)

On 13 March 2012, Ukraine requested consultations with Australia concerning certain Australian laws and regulations that impose trademark restrictions and other plain packaging requirements on tobacco products and packaging.

Ukraine challenges two key measures:

  • Australia's Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 and its implementing Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations 2011;
     
  • the Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Act 2011; and
     
  • all further regulations, related acts, policies or practices that have been adopted by Australia to implement the two key measures.

Ukraine claims that Australia's measures, especially when viewed in the context of Australia's comprehensive tobacco regulatory regime, appear to be inconsistent with:

  • Articles 1, 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 15, 16, 20 and 27 of the TRIPS Agreement;
     
  • Article 2.1 and 2.2 of the TBT Agreement; and
     
  • Article III:4 of the GATT 1994.

On 22 March 2012, Guatemala requested to join the consultations.  On 23 March 2012, Norway and Uruguay requested to join the consultations.  On 26 March 2012, Brazil, Canada, the European Union, New Zealand and Nicaragua requested to join the consultations.  Subsequently, Australia informed the DSB that it had accepted the requests of Brazil, Canada, the European Union, Guatemala, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway and Uruguay to join the consultations.

On 14 August 2012, Ukraine requested the establishment of a panel.  At its meeting on 31 August 2012, the DSB deferred the establishment of a panel.

 

Panel and Appellate Body proceedings

At its meeting on 28 September 2012, the DSB established a panel.  Argentina, Brazil, Canada, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, the European Union, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Oman, the Philippines, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Turkey, the United States, Uruguay, Zambia and Zimbabwe reserved their third party rights.  Subsequently, Chile, China, Cuba, Egypt, Nigeria, Malaysia, Malawi, Mexico, Moldova, Peru, and Thailand reserved their third party rights.

image 160 pixels wide
  

Find all documents from this case
(Searches Documents Online, most recent documents appear on top)

quick help with downloading
> comprehensive help on Documents Online

all documents

  

Problems viewing this page?
Please contact webmaster@wto.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.