|

The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.
> Preamble
> Article I
> Article II
> Article III
> Article IV
> Article V
> Article VI
> Article VII
> Article VIII
> Article IX
> Article X
> Article XI
> Article XII
> Article XIII
> Article XIV
> Article XV
> Article XVI
> Explanatory Notes
> Ministerial Decisions
and Declarations Regarding the WTO as an International Organization
> Tables
> Analytical Index main page
|

VI. Article V back to top
A. Text of Article V
Article V: Relations with
Other Organizations
1. The General Council shall make appropriate arrangements for
effective cooperation with other intergovernmental organizations that
have responsibilities related to those of the WTO.
2. The General Council may make appropriate arrangements for
consultation and cooperation with nongovernmental organizations
concerned with matters related to those of the WTO.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article V
1. Article V:1
(a) “Shall make appropriate arrangements for effective cooperation
with other intergovernmental organizations”
162. As of 30 September 2011, the WTO had concluded agreements or
memoranda of understanding with a number of intergovernmental
organizations, including but not limited to the International Monetary
Fund(269), International Telecommunication
Union(270),
World Organization on Animal Health (OIE)(271), World
Bank(272),
and the World Intellectual Property Organization.(273)
(b) Observer status
163. The General Council has allowed some intergovernmental
organizations to observe its meetings.(274) In 1995 and 1996, the
General Council accorded ad hoc observer status to seven
international intergovernmental organizations, including: the United
Nations, UNCTAD, IMF, the World Bank, FAO, WIPO, and the OECD.(275)
Subsequently, the IMF and the World Bank were granted permanent observer
status in General Council meetings by the terms of their respective
cooperation agreements.(276) In its meetings of 7 February 1997,
the General Council granted permanent observer status to the United
Nations, UNCTAD, FAO, WIPO, and the OECD.(277) In the General
Council meeting of 10 December 1997, the ITC, as a joint technical
cooperation agency between the WTO and UNCTAD, was “invited, as
appropriate, to attend meetings of those WTO bodies it wished to attend
without having to submit a request for observer status”.(278)
164. To date, no other intergovernmental organizations have been
granted permanent observer status in General Council meetings pursuant
to the guidelines for “Observer Status for International
Intergovernmental Organizations in the WTO” set out in Annex 3 to the
“Rules of Procedure for Sessions of the Ministerial Council and
Meetings of the General Council.”(279) However, consultations
have been held concerning the pending requests of intergovernmental
organizations for observer status in the General Council.(280)
Intergovernmental organizations have been accorded observer status at
various Ministerial Conferences.(281)
165. Under
Article XXVI of GATS a specific power to conclude
arrangements with organizations in the area of services has also been
allocated to the General Council, whereas under
Article 68, in fine,
of the TRIPS Agreement, the TRIPS Council is charged with establishing
appropriate arrangements for cooperation with WIPO bodies.
2. Article V:2
(a) “may make appropriate arrangements … with non-governmental
organizations”
(i) Guidelines for Arrangements on Relations with Non-Governmental
Organizations
166. At its meeting of 18 July 1996, and pursuant to
Article V:2, the
General Council adopted the “Guidelines for Arrangements on Relations
with Non-Governmental Organizations”.(282) Since the adoption
of the Guidelines, the General Council has addressed the issue of
external transparency in its meetings.(283)
(ii) Procedure to provide observer capacity
167. At its meeting of 18 July 1996, the General Council agreed to
allow non-governmental organizations to attend as observers at the
Singapore Ministerial Conference.(284) The General Council later
agreed to allow non-governmental organizations to attend as observers at
subsequent Ministerial Conferences (Geneva, Seattle, Doha, Cancún, Hong
Kong, Geneva).(285)
VII. Article VI
back to top
A. Text of Article VI
Article VI: The Secretariat
1. There shall be a Secretariat of the WTO (hereinafter referred to
as “the Secretariat”) headed by a Director-General.
2. The Ministerial Conference shall appoint the Director-General and
adopt regulations setting out the powers, duties, conditions of service
and term of office of the Director-General.
3. The Director-General shall appoint the members of the staff of the
Secretariat and determine their duties and conditions of service in
accordance with regulations adopted by the Ministerial Conference.
4. The responsibilities of the Director-General and of the staff of
the Secretariat shall be exclusively international in character. In the
discharge of their duties, the Director-General and the staff of the
Secretariat shall not seek or accept instructions from any government or
any other authority external to the WTO. They shall refrain from any
action which might adversely reflect on their position as international
officials. The Members of the WTO shall respect the international
character of the responsibilities of the Director-General and of the
staff of the Secretariat and shall not seek to influence them in the
discharge of their duties.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article VI
1. Article VI:1
(a) WTO Secretariat
168. The WTO Secretariat is based in Geneva, Switzerland and is
headed by a Director-General.
169. Because the GATT 1947 did not enter into force, but was applied
provisionally(286), the secretariat services for the GATT 1947
were provided by the Secretariat of the Interim Commission for the
International Trade Organization (ICITO).(287) The Agreement on
the Transfer of Assets, Liabilities, Records, Staff and Functions from
the Interim Commission of the International Trade Organization and the
GATT to the World Trade Organization provided that “the staff of the
ICITO shall perform the duties of the Secretariat of the WTO until the
appointment of the staff of the Secretariat of the WTO” and that the
ICITO would be dissolved as of the date on which the members of the
Secretariat were appointed.(288) Until an independent pension
plan could be established for the WTO Secretariat, the ICITO remained in
existence so that the ICITO staff could continue to participate in the
United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund; see paragraph 175
below.
170. On 16 October 1998, the General Council adopted a Decision on
Conditions of Service Applicable to the Staff of the WTO Secretariat,
including Staff Regulations and Rules and the Regulations and Rules of
the WTO Pension Plan; this Decision provided inter alia that “the
WTO Secretariat shall be established on 1 January 1999.”(289)
2. Article VI:2
(a) “the Ministerial Conference shall appoint the Director-General”
171. The General Council has appointed the following
Directors-General to date:
Mr Peter Sutherland — from 1 January 1995 to 30 April
1995,(290)
Mr Renato Ruggiero — from 1 May 1995 to 30 April
1999,(291)
Mr Mike Moore — from 1 September 1999 to 31 August
2002,(292)
Dr Supachai Panitchpakdi — from 1 September 2002 to 31 August
2005,(293) and
Mr Pascal Lamy — from 1 September 2005 to 31 August 2009, and
reappointed for a second four year term starting 1 September 2009.(294)
(b) “regulations setting out the powers, duties, conditions of
service and term of office of the Director-General”
172. At its meeting of 22 July 1999, the General Council resolved
that, “in order to improve and strengthen the current rules and
procedures [for the appointment of the Director-General], a
comprehensive set of rules and procedures for such appointments shall be
elaborated and adopted by the end of September 2000.”(295) The
General Council approved a comprehensive set of procedures for the
appointment of the Director-General at its meeting on 10–12 and 20
December 2002.(296) These procedures have been applied in
subsequent selection and appointment processes for the Director-General.(297)
3. Article VI:3
(a) “duties and conditions of service” of the WTO Secretariat
(i) Staff Regulations and Rules
173. The General Council adopted decisions regarding the terms of
service applicable to the WTO staff at its meetings of 30 October 1995,
7, 8 and 13 November 1996, 7 February 1997, 30 June–1 July 1997, and
24 April 1998.(298) The General Council further established a
Working Group on Conditions of Service Applicable to the Staff of the
WTO Secretariat(299) on 7 February 1997.
174. On 16 October 1998, taking into consideration the report of
the Working Group, the General Council adopted the proposed Staff
Regulations and Staff Rules.(300) The General Council agreed to
amend the Staff Rules at its meetings of 8 and 9 February 2001(301),
25, 26 and 30 August 2003(302), 17–18 May
2004(303), and
28 July 2009.(304)
(ii) WTO Pension Plan
175. The ICITO staff participated in the United Nations Joint Staff
Pension Fund (UNJSPF).(305) On 16 October 1998, consequent to
agreement on the conditions of service applicable to the staff and on
establishment of an independent WTO Pension Plan (WTOPP), the Executive
Committee of ICITO and the General Council decided to terminate the
membership of ICITO in the UNJSPF on 31 December 1998. The General
Council also decided to adopt the WTOPP Regulations and Administrative
Rules.(306)
176. The WTO General Council agreed to amend the WTOPP Regulations
and Administrative Rules at its meetings of 1, 2 and 6 December 2005, and
28 July 2009.(307)
177. The General Council has approved agreements on the transfer of
pension rights between the WTOPP and the UNFJSPF(308), the WTOPP
and the pension scheme of the OECD(309), the WTOPP and the
pension schemes of the Coordinated Organizations(310) and the
WTOPP and the European Communities Pension Scheme.(311)
178. The WTO Pension Plan Management Board reports annually to the
General Council.(312)
4. Article VI:4: responsibilities and conduct of Director-General and
Secretariat staff
179. See the Staff Regulations and Staff Rules of the World Trade
Organization.(313)
VIII. Article VII
back to top
A. Text of Article VII
Article VII: Budget and Contributions
1. The Director-General shall present to the Committee on Budget,
Finance and Administration the annual budget estimate and financial
statement of the WTO. The Committee on Budget, Finance and
Administration shall review the annual budget estimate and the financial
statement presented by the Director-General and make recommendations
thereon to the General Council. The annual budget estimate shall be
subject to approval by the General Council.
2. The Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration shall propose
to the General Council financial regulations which shall include
provisions setting out:
(a) the scale of contributions apportioning the expenses of the WTO
among its Members; and
(b) the measures to be taken in respect of Members in arrears.
The financial regulations shall be based, as far as practicable, on
the regulations and practices of GATT 1947.
3. The General Council shall adopt the financial regulations and the
annual budget estimate by a two-thirds majority comprising more than
half of the Members of the WTO.
4. Each Member shall promptly contribute to the WTO its share in the
expenses of the WTO in accordance with the financial regulations adopted
by the General Council.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article VII
1. Article VII:1
(a) “the Director-General shall present to the Committee on Budget,
Finance and Administration the annual budget estimate and financial
statement of the WTO”
180. The Director-General submits budgetary and financial reports to
the BFA Committee annually.(314)
(b) “the Committee on Budget, Finance & Administration shall
… make recommendations”
181. The BFA Committee makes regular recommendations to the General
Council on the Director-General’s annual budget estimates and the
financial statement.(315) These recommendations embody a
compromise among the members of the BFA Committee and are presented to
the General Council for adoption.(316)
2. Article VII:2
(a) “Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration shall propose
… financial regulations”
182. At its meeting of 15 November 1995, the General Council adopted
the WTO Financial Regulations and Financial Rules(317) on the
basis of the recommendation of the Joint WTO/GATT Committee on Budget,
Finance and Administration.(318) The WTO Financial Rules and
Regulations were most recently revised at the meeting of the BFA
Committee on 28 March 2007 and were approved by the General Council on 9
May 2007; see paragraph 189 below.
(b) “provisions setting out the scale of contributions”
183. Under the GATT 1947, the contributions of the contracting
parties to the GATT budget for each year to come were assessed on the
basis of the estimated volume of foreign trade in goods for that year.
As of 1994, each share was estimated on the basis of the contracting
party’s share in the total trade in goods of all contracting parties
and associated governments, computed on the basis of trade figures for
the last three available years, with a minimum percentage contribution
of 0.03 per cent for countries with a share of under 0.03 per cent of
the total.(319) In 1994, the Sub-Committee on Budget, Finance and
Administration of the WTO Preparatory Committee agreed that the
assessment of contributions to the WTO budget should reflect shares in
international trade in goods, services and intellectual property.(320)
184. On 15 November 1995, the General Council
approved(321)
the following recommendation of the Joint WTO/GATT Committee on Budget,
Finance and Administration for a methodology to apply this principle to
the calculation of the assessment of Members’ contributions to the WTO
budget, starting with the calculation of contributions to the 1996
budget:
“(a) The share to be contributed by each Contracting Party/Member
to the annual operating budget of the GATT/WTO shall be established on
the basis of that country’s (or separate customs territory’s)
international trade (imports plus exports) in relation to the total
international trade of all GATT Contracting Parties/WTO Members;
(b) The figures used shall be those for the last three years for
which data are available;
(c) The statistics used shall relate to trade in goods, services and
intellectual property rights as reported in balance-of-payments
statistics from the International Monetary Fund (IMF); with regard to
services, the statistics shall relate to the definition of commercial
services as applied in the WTO;
(d) Where IMF data deviate from IMF guidelines and include
transactions not related to goods, services or intellectual property
rights, adjustments provided to the WTO by the Central Bank or the
National Statistical Office of a Contracting Party/Member shall be taken
into account by the Secretariat when adequately documented and
justified;
(e) If IMF data are not available, the WTO Secretariat will use
estimates based on the best other available sources;
(f) A minimum contribution of 0.03 per cent will be applied to those
contracting parties/members whose share in the total international trade
of all GATT Contracting Parties/WTO Members is less than 0.03 per cent.”(322)
185. On 17 December 1999, the General Council approved a
recommendation by the Committee that the minimum percentage contribution
be changed to 0.015 per cent, starting with the 2000 budget. The
contribution of observers was held at 0.015 per cent.(323)
186. At its meeting of 10 October 2000, the General Council approved
an amendment of paragraph (b) of the calculation methodology as follows,
to ensure greater homogeneity in years for which data are used and
minimize variability of contribution percentages from one year to the
next:
“(b.1) Calculations of assessed contributions for the years 2001,
2002 and 2003 (which are prepared in the course of the respective
previous year) shall be based on international trade statistics for the
years 1996–1998, 1997 — 1999 and 1998–2000, respectively; or, if
these statistics are not available, for the last three years for which
statistics are available.
(b.2) Calculations of assessed contributions for at least the
following ten years, i.e. 2004, 2005, 2006 to 2013, (which are prepared
in the course of the respective previous year) shall be based on
international trade statistics: for the years 1997–2001, 1998–2002,
1999–2003, etc. respectively; or, if these statistics are not
available, for the last five years for which statistics are available.”(324)
(c) “measures to be taken in respect of Members in arrears”
187. The BFA Committee regularly reviews the status of contributions
assessed to the Members and adopted Administrative Measures in respect
of Members in arrears.(325) At its meeting of 15 May 2006 the
General Council approved revised Administrative Measures responding to
the continued problem of accumulation of arrears, which had implications
for all Members in the annual final accounts of the organization.(326)
The Administrative Measures apply to Members in Categories I–IV,
depending on how many years’ assessed contributions remain
outstanding. Members in Category IV are designated as Inactive Members.
Administrative Measures are suspended for Inactive Members which agree
to, and abide by, a defined schedule of instalment payments aimed at
liquidating all arrears.(327)
(d) Doha Development Agenda Global Trust Fund
188. Following the guidelines set by the Doha Ministerial
Conference(328),
the BFA Committee developed a plan to ensure long-term funding for WTO
technical assistance at an overall level no lower than that of the year
2001. The General Council approved the plan at its meeting of 15–16
December 2003.(329)
3. Article VII:3
(a) “The General Council shall adopt the financial regulations and
the annual budget estimate”
189. The General Council adopted the BFA Committee’s proposed
Financial Rules and Regulations on 15 November 1995, approved amendments
to the Financial Regulations on 26 August 2003 and 8 May 2007, and
approved amendments to the Financial Rules on 8 May 2007.(330)
190. On 15 December 2000, the General Council approved guidelines on
Voluntary Contributions, Gifts, or Donations from Non-Governmental
Donors.(331) On 27 July 2004, the General Council approved
revised Guidelines.(332)
IX. Article VIII
back to top
A. Text of Article VIII
Article VIII: Status of the WTO
1. The WTO shall have legal personality, and shall be accorded by
each of its Members such legal capacity as may be necessary for the
exercise of its functions.
2. The WTO shall be accorded by each of its Members such privileges
and immunities as are necessary for the exercise of its functions.
3. The officials of the WTO and the representatives of the Members
shall similarly be accorded by each of its Members such privileges and
immunities as are necessary for the independent exercise of their
functions in connection with the WTO.
4. The privileges and immunities to be accorded by a Member to the
WTO, its officials, and the representatives of its Members shall be
similar to the privileges and immunities stipulated in the Convention on
the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, approved by
the General Assembly of the United Nations on 21 November 1947.
5. The WTO may conclude a headquarters agreement.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article VIII
1. Article VIII:1, VIII:2 and VIII:3
(a) General
191.
Paragraphs 1–3 establish certain principles regarding the
legal personality, the privileges and immunities enjoyed by the
Organization, its officials and the representatives of its Members, and
in particular the functional character of these notions. Privileges and
immunities are extended to the staff of the Organization with a view to
facilitating the independent exercise of their functions. Officials of
the Secretariat are, in turn, required to observe the laws of the host
State and to perform their private obligations accordingly. The
Director-General may decide whether, in respect of these obligations,
and in the interest of the WTO, an immunity shall be waived.(333)
2. Article VIII:4
192. Under this provision, Members are bound by the obligation to
grant “similar” privileges and immunities to the WTO as those laid
down in the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the
Specialized Agencies 1947(334), whether or not the Member in
question is a party to that Convention.
3. Article VIII:5
(a) Headquarters Agreement
193. The Agreement between the WTO and the Swiss Confederation to
determine the legal status of the Organization in Switzerland(335)
was approved by the General Council on 31 May 1995(336), together
with the Infrastructure Contract between the WTO and the Swiss
Confederation, the Republic and Canton of Geneva and the Fondation des
Immeubles pour les Organisations Internationales (FIPOI) at Geneva.(337)
194. On 31 July 2008, the General Council approved conclusion of a
memorandum of understanding between the Swiss Confederation and the WTO
on the Long-Term Housing Needs of the WTO, concerning renovation and
adaptation of the building housing the WTO, and other facilities for the
WTO.(338)
(b) Transfer of assets
195. Pursuant to a decision adopted by the Preparatory Committee for
the World Trade Organization on 8 December 1994, the Preparatory
Committee, the CONTRACTING PARTIES to GATT 1947 and the Executive
Committee of ICITO entered into the Agreement on the Transfer of Assets,
Liabilities, Records, Staff and Functions from the Interim Commission of
the International Trade Organization and the GATT to the World Trade
Organization.(339)
X. Article IX
back to top
A. Text of Article IX
Article IX: Decision-Making
1. The WTO shall continue the practice of
decision making by consensus
followed under GATT 1947.(1) Except as otherwise provided, where a
decision cannot be arrived at by consensus, the matter at issue shall be
decided by voting. At meetings of the Ministerial Conference and the
General Council, each Member of the WTO shall have one vote. Where the
European Communities exercise their right to vote, they shall have a
number of votes equal to the number of their member States(2) which are
Members of the WTO. Decisions of the Ministerial Conference and the
General Council shall be taken by a majority of the votes cast, unless
otherwise provided in this Agreement or in the relevant Multilateral
Trade Agreement.(3)
(footnote original) 1 The body concerned shall be deemed to
have decided by consensus on a matter submitted for its consideration,
if no Member, present at the meeting when the decision is taken,
formally objects to the proposed decision.
(footnote original) 2 The number of votes of the European
Communities and their member States shall in no case exceed the number
of the member States of the European Communities.
(footnote original) 3 Decisions by the General Council when
convened as the Dispute Settlement Body shall be taken only in
accordance with the provisions of paragraph 4 of Article 2 of the
Dispute Settlement Understanding.
2. The Ministerial Conference and the General Council shall have the
exclusive authority to adopt interpretations of this Agreement and of
the Multilateral Trade Agreements. In the case of an interpretation of a
Multilateral Trade Agreement in Annex 1, they shall exercise their
authority on the basis of a recommendation by the Council overseeing the
functioning of that Agreement. The decision to adopt an interpretation
shall be taken by a three-fourths majority of the Members. This
paragraph shall not be used in a manner that would undermine the
amendment provisions in Article X.
3. In exceptional circumstances, the Ministerial Conference may
decide to waive an obligation imposed on a Member by this Agreement or
any of the Multilateral Trade Agreements, provided that any such
decision shall be taken by three fourths(4) of the Members unless
otherwise provided for in this paragraph.
(footnote original) 4 A decision to grant a waiver in respect
of any obligation subject to a transition period or a period for staged
implementation that the requesting Member has not performed by the end
of the relevant period shall be taken only by consensus.
(a) A request for a waiver concerning this Agreement shall be
submitted to the Ministerial Conference for consideration pursuant to
the practice of decision making by consensus. The Ministerial Conference
shall establish a time-period, which shall not exceed 90 days, to
consider the request. If consensus is not reached during the
time-period, any decision to grant a waiver shall be taken by three
fourths(4) of the Members.
(b) A request for a waiver concerning the Multilateral Trade
Agreements in Annexes 1A or 1B or 1C and their annexes shall be
submitted initially to the Council for Trade in Goods, the Council for
Trade in Services or the Council for TRIPS, respectively, for
consideration during a time-period which shall not exceed 90 days. At
the end of the time-period, the relevant Council shall submit a report
to the Ministerial Conference.
4. A decision by the Ministerial Conference granting a waiver shall
state the exceptional circumstances justifying the decision, the terms
and conditions governing the application of the waiver, and the date on
which the waiver shall terminate. Any waiver granted for a period of more
than one year shall be reviewed by the Ministerial Conference not later
than one year after it is granted, and thereafter annually until the
waiver terminates. In each review, the Ministerial Conference shall
examine whether the exceptional circumstances justifying the waiver
still exist and whether the terms and conditions attached to the waiver
have been met. The Ministerial Conference, on the basis of the annual
review, may extend, modify or terminate the waiver.
5. Decisions under a Plurilateral Trade Agreement, including any
decisions on interpretations and waivers, shall be governed by the
provisions of that Agreement.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article IX
1. Article IX:1
(a) “The WTO shall continue the practice of decision-making by
consensus”
196. The General Council adopted the decision on “Decision-Making
Procedures Under Articles IX and XII of the WTO Agreement” on 15
November 1995.(340) See also
paragraph 203 below.
2. Article IX:2
(a) “The Ministerial Conference and the General Council shall have
the exclusive authority to adopt interpretations of this Agreement and
of the Multilateral Trade Agreements”
197. In Japan
— Alcoholic Beverages II, the Appellate
Body rejected the Panel’s finding that panel reports adopted by the
GATT 1947 CONTRACTING PARTIES and the DSB constitute “subsequent
practice” within the meaning of Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on
the Law of Treaties, by virtue of the decision to adopt them.(341)
In support of this conclusion, the Appellate Body referred to the
exclusive authority of the Ministerial Conference and General Council to
adopt interpretations of the WTO Agreement under Article
IX:2:
“We do not believe that the CONTRACTING PARTIES, in deciding to
adopt a panel report, intended that their decision would constitute a
definitive interpretation of the relevant provisions of GATT 1947. Nor
do we believe that this is contemplated under GATT 1994. There is
specific cause for this conclusion in the WTO Agreement. Article
IX:2 of the WTO Agreement provides: ‘The Ministerial Conference
and the General Council shall have the exclusive authority to adopt
interpretations of this Agreement and of the Multilateral Trade
Agreements’. Article IX:2 provides further that such decisions ’shall
be taken by a three-fourths majority of the Members’. The fact that
such an ‘exclusive authority’ in interpreting the treaty has been
established so specifically in the WTO Agreement is reason enough
to conclude that such authority does not exist by implication or by
inadvertence elsewhere.
Historically, the decisions to adopt panel reports under Article
XXIII of the GATT 1947 were different from joint action by the
CONTRACTING PARTIES under Article XXV of the GATT 1947. Today, their
nature continues to differ from interpretations of the GATT 1994 and the
other Multilateral Trade Agreements under the WTO Agreement by
the WTO Ministerial Conference or the General Council. This is clear
from a reading of Article 3.9 of the DSU, which states:
The provisions of this Understanding are without prejudice to the
rights of Members to seek authoritative interpretation of provisions of
a covered agreement through decision-making under the WTO Agreement or a
covered agreement which is a Plurilateral Trade Agreement.”(342)
198. In US
— Wool Shirts and Blouses, the Appellate
Body, in support of the Panel’s exercise of judicial economy referred
to the exclusive authority of the Ministerial Conference and the General
Council to adopt interpretations of the WTO Agreement:
“As India emphasizes, Article 3.2 of the
DSU states that the
Members of the WTO ‘recognize’ that the dispute settlement system
’serves to preserve the rights and obligations of Members under the
covered agreements, and to clarify the existing provisions of those
agreements in accordance with customary rules of interpretation of
public international law’ (emphasis added). Given the explicit aim of
dispute settlement that permeates the DSU, we do not consider
that Article 3.2 of the DSU is meant to encourage either panels
or the Appellate Body to ‘make law’ by clarifying existing
provisions of the WTO Agreement outside the context of resolving
a particular dispute. A panel need only address those claims which must
be addressed in order to resolve the matter in issue in the dispute.(343)
We note, furthermore, that Article IX of the WTO Agreement
provides that the Ministerial Conference and the General Council have
the ‘exclusive authority’ to adopt interpretations of the WTO
Agreement and the Multilateral Trade Agreements.(344)”(345)
199. The first formal request for an authoritative interpretation of
the Multilateral Trade Agreements was made on 21 January 1999(346)
in relation to Articles 3.7, 21.5,
22.2, 22.6,
22.7 and 23 of the DSU.
The General Council discussed the request at its meeting of 15 and 16
February 1999. The Chairman’s summing up noted that some delegations
had considered that these matters could appropriately be the subject of
interpretation, but many others clearly did not, most had registered
their concern about voting, and there was broad support for reaching a
negotiated solution in the discussions on review of the DSU; he urged
the DSB to consider the issues in the request on an urgent basis and
seek agreement.(347)
200. In US
— FSC, the Appellate Body noted the
difference between an authoritative interpretation and an interpretation
in dispute settlement:
“Under the WTO Agreement, an authoritative interpretation by
the Members of the WTO, under Article IX:2 of
that Agreement, is to be
distinguished from the rulings and recommendations of the DSB, made on
the basis of panel and Appellate Body Reports. In terms of Article 3.2
of the DSU, the rulings and recommendations of the DSB serve only ‘to
clarify the existing provisions of those agreements’ and ‘cannot add
to or diminish the rights and obligations provided in the covered
agreements.’”(348)
201. In Chile
— Price Band System, the Panel rejected
an argument that Chile’s position was supported by a letter from the
GATT Secretariat, and stated that
“The WTO Agreement gives the Ministerial Conference and the General
Council the exclusive right to adopt interpretations of the WTO
Agreement. While the Secretariat has in the past, and will in the future
be requested to provide advice to Members of the WTO, we believe the
general rule of reserving the legal right to adopt interpretations to
the Members to be the appropriate standard in this context, while, of
course, recognizing that the WTO rules were not in force at the time in
question.”(349)
202. In compliance proceedings in the EC
— Bananas — III dispute, the Appellate Body discussed methods that
Members may use to interpret or modify WTO law provided for in the WTO
Agreement, and considered that a multilateral interpretation under
Article IX:2 can be likened to a “subsequent agreement” in the sense
of Article 31(3)(a) of the Vienna Convention (addressed in the Chapter
on the DSU):
“Article IX:2 of the WTO Agreement sets out specific
requirements for decisions that may be taken by the Ministerial
Conference or the General Council to adopt interpretations of provisions
of the Multilateral Trade Agreements. Such multilateral interpretations
are meant to clarify the meaning of existing obligations, not to modify
their content. Article IX:2 emphasizes that such interpretations ‘shall
not be used in a manner that would undermine the amendment provisions in
Article X’. A multilateral interpretation should also be distinguished
from a waiver, which allows a Member to depart from an existing WTO
obligation for a limited period of time. We consider that a multilateral
interpretation pursuant to Article IX:2 of the WTO Agreement can
be likened to a subsequent agreement regarding the interpretation of the
treaty or the application of its provisions pursuant to Article 31(3)(a)
of the Vienna Convention, as far as the interpretation of the WTO
agreements is concerned.”(350)
3. Article IX:3 and IX:4: Waivers
(a) Decision-making procedures for granting a waiver in the WTO
203. On 15 November 1995, the General Council adopted a decision on
“Decision-Making Procedures Under Articles IX and
XII of the WTO
Agreement”(351)
“On occasions when the General Council deals with matters related
to requests for waivers or accessions to the WTO under Articles IX
or XII of the WTO Agreement respectively, the General Council will
seek a decision in accordance with Article IX:1. Except as otherwise
provided, where a decision cannot be arrived at by consensus, the matter
at issue shall be decided by voting under the relevant provisions of
Articles IX or XII.”(352)
(b) Waivers of obligations under the WTO Agreements
204. As of 30 September 2011, there have been 31 waiver
decisions(353),
including 14 waivers of Articles I and/or
Article XIII of the GATT 1994
in connection with trade preferences, 14 waivers delaying application of
WTO obligations, one waiver of Article XV:6 of the GATT
1994, the waiver
decision on implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the
TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, and the waiver decision implementing
the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme for Rough Diamonds.
205. Tables at the end of this Chapter list (a) waivers of other WTO
provisions; and (b) the GATT 1947 waivers referred to in paragraph 206
below. Each table lists the waiver decision with the Members whose
measures are covered by the waiver, the date of the decision, the date
of expiry of the waiver, and the document reference.
(c) Waivers originally granted under the GATT 1947
206. The GATT 1994 incorporation text defines the “GATT 1994” as
incorporating, inter alia, “decisions on waivers granted under
Article XXV of GATT 1947 and still in force on the date of entry into
force of the WTO Agreement”. Footnote 6 to that text specified the
waivers initially covered (certain waivers(354) that were in
force as of the date of the Uruguay Round Final Act), and mandated the
Ministerial Conference to establish a revised list adjusted to allow for
approval of new GATT 1947 waivers or expiry of existing such waivers, up
to the WTO’s date of entry into force. The revised list was issued in
1995.(355)
207. The Understanding in Respect of Waivers of Obligations under the
GATT 1994 provides:
“Any waiver in effect on the date of entry into force of the WTO
Agreement shall terminate, unless extended in accordance with the
procedures [in the Understanding] and those of Article IX of the WTO
Agreement, on the date of its expiry or two years from the date of entry
into force of the WTO Agreement, whichever is earlier.”
208. Accordingly, all GATT 1947 waivers have terminated, unless they
were extended by a WTO decision. Regarding GATT practice concerning
waivers, see under Article XXV:5 in the GATT Analytical Index.
(d) Interpretation of waivers
(i) Exceptional nature of waivers
209. In EC
— Bananas III, the European Communities
argued that a certain waiver on its import regime for bananas should be
interpreted so as to justify a deviation from Article XIII of the GATT
1994 although it waived only compliance with Article I of the GATT 1994
in its terms. The Panel accepted this argument to the extent that “the
scope of Article XIII is identical with that of
Article I”(356),
but the Appellate Body rejected this finding, stating:
“The wording of the Lomé Waiver is clear and unambiguous. By its
precise terms, it waives only ‘the provisions of paragraph 1 of
Article I of the General Agreement … to the extent necessary’
to do what is ‘required’ by the relevant provisions of the Lomé
Convention. The Lomé Waiver does not refer to, or mention in any way,
any other provision of the GATT 1994 or of any other covered agreement.
Neither the circumstances surrounding the negotiation of the Lomé
Waiver, nor the need to interpret it so as to permit it to achieve its
objectives, allow us to disregard the clear and plain wording of the
Lomé Waiver by extending its scope to include a waiver from the
obligations under Article XIII. Moreover, although Articles I and
XIII
of the GATT 1994 are both non-discrimination provisions, their
relationship is not such that a waiver from the obligations under
Article I implies a waiver from the obligations under Article
XIII.(357)
The Panel’s interpretation of the Lomé Waiver as including a
waiver from the GATT 1994 obligations relating to the allocation of
tariff quotas is difficult to reconcile with the limited GATT practice in
the interpretation of waivers, the strict disciplines to which waivers
are subjected under the WTO Agreement, the history of the
negotiations of this particular waiver and the limited GATT practice
relating to granting waivers from the obligations of Article
XIII.
There is little previous GATT practice on the interpretation of
waivers. In the panel report in United States — Sugar Waiver,
the panel stated:
‘The Panel took into account in its examination that waivers are
granted according to Article XXV:5 only in ‘exceptional circumstances’,
that they waive obligations under the basic rules of the General
Agreement and that their terms and conditions consequently have to be
interpreted narrowly.’(358)
Although the WTO Agreement does not provide any specific rules on the
interpretation of waivers, Article IX of the WTO Agreement and the
Understanding in Respect of Waivers of Obligations under the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, which provide requirements for
granting and renewing waivers, stress the exceptional nature of waivers
and subject waivers to strict disciplines. Thus, waivers should be
interpreted with great care.
With regard to the history of the negotiations of the
Lomé Waiver,
we have already noted that the CONTRACTING PARTIES limited the scope of
the waiver by replacing ‘preferential treatment foreseen by the
Lomé Convention’ with ‘preferential treatment required by
the Lomé Convention’ (emphasis added). This change clearly suggests
that the CONTRACTING PARTIES wanted to restrict the scope of the Lomé
Waiver.
Finally, we note that between 1948 and 1994, the CONTRACTING PARTIES
granted only one waiver of Article XIII of the GATT 1947.(359) In
view of the truly exceptional nature of waivers from the
non-discrimination obligations under Article
XIII, it is all the more
difficult to accept the proposition that a waiver that does not
explicitly refer to Article XIII
would nevertheless waive the
obligations of that Article. If the CONTRACTING PARTIES had intended to
waive the obligations of the European Communities under Article
XIII in
the Lomé Waiver, they would have said so explicitly.”(360)
(ii) Waivers cannot modify or add to obligations
210. In compliance proceedings in the EC
— Bananas III
dispute, the Appellate Body reviewed a finding of a panel under Article
21.5 that an EC tariff concession had expired on 31 December 2002 but
that in adopting a waiver decision in respect of EC measures on bananas,
the WTO Members had agreed to extend the duration of that tariff
concession. The Appellate Body referred to the requirements for requests
for new waivers in the Understanding in Respect of Waivers of
Obligations under the GATT 1994, as demonstrating the exceptional nature
of waivers:
“‘The need to state the exceptional circumstances, to specify the
terms and conditions governing the application of the waiver, and to
describe the specific policy objectives that a Member seeks to pursue,
make clear that a waiver is a specific and exceptional instrument
subject to strict disciplines.’ These elements do not suggest that a
waiver should be construed as an agreement on issues not explicitly
reflected in its terms and conditions, justifying circumstances, and
stated policy objectives. …
In our view, the function of a waiver is to relieve a Member, for a
specified period of time, from a particular obligation provided for in
the covered agreements, subject to the terms, conditions, justifying
exceptional circumstances or policy objectives described in the waiver
decision. Its purpose is not to modify existing provisions in the
agreements, let alone create new law or add to or amend the obligations
under a covered agreement or Schedule. Therefore, waivers are
exceptional in nature, subject to strict disciplines and should be
interpreted with great care.”(361)
211. The Appellate Body also reversed a finding by the Panel in the
same compliance proceeding, that the waiver in question qualified as a
“subsequent agreement” (in the sense of Article 31(3)(a) of the
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties) regarding interpretation or
application of the EC Schedule. The Appellate Body found that waivers
were not “akin to” subsequent agreements in this sense.(362)
The Appellate Body also found that the waiver at issue “does not
constitute an amendment of the European Communities’ Schedule …
Extending an obligation with a temporal limitation is a modification
that ‘alter[s] the rights and obligations of the Members’.
Therefore, if implemented by means of an amendment” the procedural
provisions of Article X would apply; the waiver at issue “is a
decision taken by the Ministerial Conference, which did not require
formal acceptance by the Membership as foreseen under Article
X:7.”(363)
(iii) Limited duration of waivers
212. In compliance proceedings in the EC
— Bananas III
dispute, the Appellate Body noted that under the WTO Agreement, waivers
are inherently limited in duration:
“Article IX:4 requires that the decision granting the waiver state
the date on which the waiver shall terminate, thus ensuring that waivers
are granted for limited periods of time.”(364)
XI. Article X
back to top
A. Text of Article X
Article X: Amendments
1. Any Member of the WTO may initiate a proposal to amend the
provisions of this Agreement or the Multilateral Trade Agreements in
Annex 1 by submitting such proposal to the Ministerial Conference. The
Councils listed in paragraph 5 of Article IV may also submit to the
Ministerial Conference proposals to amend the provisions of the
corresponding Multilateral Trade Agreements in Annex 1 the functioning
of which they oversee. Unless the Ministerial Conference decides on a
longer period, for a period of 90 days after the proposal has been
tabled formally at the Ministerial Conference any decision by the
Ministerial Conference to submit the proposed amendment to the Members
for acceptance shall be taken by consensus. Unless the provisions of
paragraphs 2, 5 or 6 apply, that decision shall specify whether the
provisions of paragraphs 3 or 4 shall apply. If consensus is reached,
the Ministerial Conference shall forthwith submit the proposed amendment
to the Members for acceptance. If consensus is not reached at a meeting
of the Ministerial Conference within the established period, the
Ministerial Conference shall decide by a two-thirds majority of the
Members whether to submit the proposed amendment to the Members for
acceptance. Except as provided in paragraphs 2,
5 and 6, the provisions
of paragraph 3 shall apply to the proposed amendment, unless the
Ministerial Conference decides by a three-fourths majority of the
Members that the provisions of paragraph 4 shall apply.
2. Amendments to the provisions of this Article and to the provisions
of the following Articles shall take effect only upon acceptance by all
Members:
Article IX of this Agreement;
Articles I and
II of GATT 1994;
Article II:1 of GATS;
Article 4 of the Agreement on
TRIPS.
3. Amendments to provisions of this Agreement, or of the Multilateral
Trade Agreements in Annexes 1A and 1C, other than those listed in
paragraphs 2 and 6, of a nature that would alter the rights and
obligations of the Members, shall take effect for the Members that have
accepted them upon acceptance by two thirds of the Members and
thereafter for each other Member upon acceptance by it. The Ministerial
Conference may decide by a three-fourths majority of the Members that
any amendment made effective under this paragraph is of such a nature
that any Member which has not accepted it within a period specified by
the Ministerial Conference in each case shall be free to withdraw from
the WTO or to remain a Member with the consent of the Ministerial
Conference.
4. Amendments to provisions of this Agreement or of the Multilateral
Trade Agreements in Annexes 1A and 1C, other than those listed in
paragraphs 2 and 6, of a nature that would not alter the rights and
obligations of the Members, shall take effect for all Members upon
acceptance by two thirds of the Members.
5. Except as provided in
paragraph 2 above, amendments to Parts
I, II
and III of GATS and the respective annexes shall take effect for the
Members that have accepted them upon acceptance by two thirds of the
Members and thereafter for each Member upon acceptance by it. The
Ministerial Conference may decide by a three-fourths majority of the
Members that any amendment made effective under the preceding provision
is of such a nature that any Member which has not accepted it within a
period specified by the Ministerial Conference in each case shall be
free to withdraw from the WTO or to remain a Member with the consent of
the Ministerial Conference. Amendments to Parts
IV, V and VI of GATS and
the respective annexes shall take effect for all Members upon acceptance
by two thirds of the Members.
6. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article, amendments
to the Agreement on TRIPS meeting the requirements of paragraph 2 of
Article 71 thereof may be adopted by the Ministerial Conference without
further formal acceptance process.
7. Any Member accepting an amendment to this Agreement or to a
Multilateral Trade Agreement in Annex 1 shall deposit an instrument of
acceptance with the Director-General of the WTO within the period of
acceptance specified by the Ministerial Conference.
8. Any Member of the WTO may initiate a proposal to amend the
provisions of the Multilateral Trade Agreements in Annexes 2 and 3 by
submitting such proposal to the Ministerial Conference. The decision to
approve amendments to the Multilateral Trade Agreement in Annex 2 shall
be made by consensus and these amendments shall take effect for all
Members upon approval by the Ministerial Conference. Decisions to
approve amendments to the Multilateral Trade Agreement in Annex 3 shall
take effect for all Members upon approval by the Ministerial Conference.
9. The Ministerial Conference, upon the request of the Members
parties to a trade agreement, may decide exclusively by consensus to add
that agreement to Annex 4. The Ministerial Conference, upon the request
of the Members parties to a Plurilateral Trade Agreement, may decide to
delete that Agreement from Annex 4.
10. Amendments to a Plurilateral Trade Agreement shall be governed by
the provisions of that Agreement.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article X
1. Article X:1
(a) “Amendments to this Agreement or the Multilateral Trade
Agreements in Annex 1”
213. At its meeting of 6 December 2005, the Council for TRIPS
approved a proposal, pursuant to Article X:1, for a decision on an
amendment to the TRIPS Agreement for forwarding to the General Council.(365)
The Council also approved the forwarding, along with the draft decision,
of the text of two statements to be made by the Chairman of the General
Council prior to the adoption by the General Council of the proposal.(366)
214. On 6 December, the General Council then adopted by consensus the
proposed Decision on amending the TRIPS Agreement; as agreed, prior to
adoption the Chairman read out for the record the two agreed statements.(367) The Decision provides as follows:
“Amendment of the TRIPS Agreement
Decision
of 6 December 2005
The General Council;
Having
regard to paragraph 1 of Article X of the Marrakesh
Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (‘the WTO
Agreement’); …
Having
considered the proposal to amend the TRIPS Agreement
submitted by the Council for TRIPS (IP/C/41);
Noting the consensus to submit this proposed amendment to the
Members for acceptance;
Decides as follows:
1. The Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement attached to this
Decision is hereby adopted and submitted to the Members for acceptance.
2. The Protocol shall be open for acceptance by Members until 1
December 2007 or such later date as may be decided by the Ministerial
Conference.
3. The Protocol shall take effect in accordance with the provisions
of paragraph 3 of Article X of the WTO Agreement.
PROTOCOL AMENDING THE TRIPS AGREEMENT
Members
of the World Trade Organization;
Having regard to the Decision of the General Council in document
WT/L/641, adopted pursuant to
paragraph 1 of Article X of the Marrakesh
Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (‘the WTO
Agreement’);
Hereby agree as follows:
1. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights (the ‘TRIPS Agreement’) shall, upon the entry into force of
the Protocol pursuant to paragraph 4, be amended as set out in the Annex
to this Protocol, by inserting Article 31bis after Article 31 and by
inserting the Annex to the TRIPS Agreement after Article
73.
2. Reservations may not be entered in respect of any of the
provisions of this Protocol without the consent of the other Members.
3. This Protocol shall be open for acceptance by Members until 1
December 2007 or such later date as may be decided by the Ministerial
Conference.
4. This Protocol shall enter into force in accordance with
paragraph
3 of Article X of the WTO Agreement.
5. This Protocol shall be deposited with the Director-General of the
World Trade Organization who shall promptly furnish to each Member a
certified copy thereof and a notification of each acceptance thereof
pursuant to paragraph 3.
6. This Protocol shall be registered in accordance with the
provisions of Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Done at Geneva this sixth day of December two thousand and five,
in a single copy in the English, French and Spanish languages, each text
being authentic.”
2. Article X:3
215. The General Council extended the period for acceptance of the
Protocol Amending the TRIPS Amendment, most recently until 31 December
2011.(368)
216. As of 30 September 2011, 34 Members, including the European
Community on behalf of its Member States, had notified their acceptance
of the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement.(369) Consequently
the Protocol had not entered into force.
3. Article X:9
(a) Additions to Plurilateral Trade Agreements
217. As of 30 September 2011, no Plurilateral Trade Agreements had
been added to Annex 4.
(b) Deletions of Plurilateral Trade Agreements
218. On 30 September 1997, the International Dairy Council decided to
terminate the International Dairy Agreement and the International Meat
Council decided to terminate the International Bovine Meat Agreement.
Each decision requested that the Ministerial Conference delete the
respective Agreement from Annex 4, pursuant to Article
X:9.(370)
On 10 December 1997, the General Council adopted decisions deleting the
International Dairy Agreement and the International Bovine Meat
Agreement from Annex 4.(371)
4. Article X:10
(a) “Amendments to a Plurilateral Agreement shall be governed by
the provisions of that Agreement”
219. The following provisions govern amendments to the respective
Plurilateral Agreements:
Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft —
Article
9.5;
Agreement on Government Procurement
— Article
XXIV:9.
220. The former International Dairy Agreement had amendment
provisions in Article VIII:4 and the International Bovine Meat Agreement
had amendment provisions in Article
VI:4.
221. The Agreement on
Government Procurement, originally concluded in
1979, was amended in 1988 and was replaced in 1994. Article XXIV:7(b)
and (c) of the 1994 Agreement provide for negotiations to improve and
update its text, extend its coverage and eliminate remaining
discriminatory measures. In December 2006, negotiators reached an
understanding on revision of the 1994 Agreement, and reached agreement
on a process to conclude negotiations on expansion of coverage, based on
the revised text. The revised text, checked for legal and linguistic
consistency, was made available in December 2010, on the understanding
that its adoption is subject to a mutually satisfactory outcome to the
related negotiations on the coverage of the Agreement.(372)
222. The Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft has been amended twice,
in 1986(373) and in
2001.(374) See the Chapter on this
Agreement.
XII. Article XI
back to top
A. Text of Article XI
Article XI: Original Membership
1. The contracting parties to GATT 1947 as of the date of entry into
force of this Agreement, and the European Communities, which accept this
Agreement and the Multilateral Trade Agreements and for which Schedules
of Concessions and Commitments are annexed to GATT 1994 and for which
Schedules of Specific Commitments are annexed to GATS shall become
original Members of the WTO.
2. The least-developed countries recognized as such by the United
Nations will only be required to undertake commitments and concessions
to the extent consistent with their individual development, financial
and trade needs or their administrative and institutional capabilities.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XI
1. General
(a) Members
223. On 30 September 2011, the WTO membership stood at 153 Members,
including 123 original Members, 25 Members that negotiated accession
under Article XII, and five Members that acceded through simplified
procedures under Article XII in 1995–96. See under
Article XI:1 and
XII below. A table of Members appears at the end of this Chapter.
(b) Observers
224. The Rules of Procedure for the Ministerial Conference and the
General Council provide that representatives of States or separate
customs territories may attend meetings as observers on the invitation
of the Ministerial Conference or the General Council, in accordance with
paragraphs 9 to 11 of Guidelines in Annex 2 to the Rules.(375)
225. The provisions in Annex 2 on observer status differ for the
Ministerial Conference and for the General Council. Governments accorded
observer status at Ministerial Conference sessions do not automatically
have that status in the General Council or its subsidiary bodies, but
governments accorded observer status in the General Council and its
subsidiary bodies are invited to attend sessions of the Ministerial
Conference as observers.
226. The Guidelines state that “[t]he purpose of observer status in
the General Council and its subsidiary bodies is to allow a government
to better acquaint itself with the WTO and its activities, and to
prepare and initiate negotiations for accession to the WTO Agreement.”(376)
Governments wishing to request observer status in the General Council
are required to address to that body a communication expressing the
intent to initiate negotiations for accession to the WTO Agreement
within five years, and provide a description of their current economic
and trade policies and any intended future reforms.(377) However,
the General Council agreed to observer status for the Holy See, which
could not accede to the WTO.(378)
227. As of 30 September 2011, there were 31 WTO observer governments.
A table of observers appears at the end of this Chapter.
228. Also see
paragraph 163 above on intergovernmental organizations;
paragraph 167 above on nongovernmental organizations; and paragraph 250
below on observer status for applicants for accession.
2. Article XI:1
(a) “The contracting parties to GATT 1947 … shall become original
Members of the WTO”
229. Under
Article XI:1, in general a government or the European
Communities could become an original member of the WTO if it was a
participant in the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations, it
had schedules under GATT and GATS annexed to the Uruguay Round Final
Act, and it was a contracting party to GATT 1947 as of 1 January 1995.
230.
Article XIV:1 set the deadline for acceptance of the WTO
Agreement by original Members at 1 January 1997, unless determined
otherwise. All contracting parties to GATT 1947 that were eligible to
become original Members of the WTO before 1 January 1997 became original
Members.(379)
231. Of the 153 Members, 123 are original Members while 30 acceded to
the WTO Agreement.
232. The WTO Agreement entered into force for the following 76
original Members on 1 January 1995: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina,
Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Belize,
Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire,
Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominica, European Communities(380),
Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guyana, Honduras, Hong
Kong(381), Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy,
Japan, Kenya, Korea, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Macao (China)(382),
Malaysia, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia,
Netherlands (for the Kingdom in Europe and for the Netherlands
Antilles), New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru,
Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines, Senegal, Singapore, Slovak Republic, South Africa, Spain,
Sri Lanka, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda,
United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela and Zambia.
233. The remaining 47 original Members accepted the WTO Agreement
after 1 January 1995: Trinidad and Tobago, Zimbabwe, Dominican Republic,
Jamaica, Turkey, Tunisia, Cuba, Israel, Colombia, El Salvador, Burkina
Faso, Egypt, Botswana, Central African Republic, Djibouti, Guinea
Bissau, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Maldives, Mauritania, Togo, Poland,
Switzerland, Guatemala, Burundi, Sierra Leone, Cyprus, Slovenia,
Mozambique, Liechtenstein, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Guinea (Republic of),
Madagascar, Cameroon, Fiji, Haiti, Benin, Rwanda, Solomon Islands, Chad,
Gambia, Angola, Niger, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Congo.
(b) Special cases regarding acceptance and accession in 1994–96
234. A number of governments which were not contracting parties to
the GATT participated in the Uruguay Round negotiations, and could not
have become original Members of the WTO under the general rule in Article
XI:1, because paragraph 5 of the Uruguay Round Final Act
provided that “the schedules of participants which are not contracting
parties to GATT 1947 as of the date of the Final Act are not definitive
and shall be subsequently completed for the purpose of their accession
to GATT 1947 and their accession to the WTO Agreement.” In addition,
some Uruguay Round participants became GATT 1947 contracting parties by
succession under GATT Article XXVI:5(c) without any tariff concessions,
and were unable to finalize GATT and GATS schedules by 15 April 1994.
The Decision on Measures in Favour of Least Developed Countries, adopted
by Ministers at Marrakesh, also provided in paragraph 1 that “[t]he
least-developed countries shall be given additional time of one year
from 15 April 1995 to submit their schedules as required in Article XI”.(383)
235. To facilitate WTO membership by these governments, the Ministers
adopted at Marrakesh the Decision on the Acceptance of and Accession to
the Agreement Establishing the WTO.(384) This Decision provided
that any Final Act signatory in these categories (Paragraph 5 of the
Final Act, GATT Article
XXVI:5(c), or LDC) could submit its GATT and
GATS schedules for finalization to the WTO’s Preparatory Committee in
late 1995. Any State or separate customs territory that became a GATT
contracting party after 15 April 1994 but before the WTO Agreement
entered into force could also submit GATT and GATS schedules to the
Preparatory Committee for finalization. Those that finalized their
schedules on time could accept as original Members. The Decision further
provided:
“The WTO Agreement shall be open for acceptance in accordance with
Article XIV of that Agreement by contracting parties to GATT 1947 the
schedules of which have been so submitted and approved before the entry
into force of the WTO Agreement.
The provisions of subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this paragraph shall
be without prejudice to the right of the least developed countries to
submit their schedules within one year from 15 April 1994.”(385)
236. Thus, if a Uruguay Round participant could submit and gain
approval for its GATT and GATS schedules before 1 January 1995, it could
accept the WTO Agreement under Article XIV:1 as an original Member. If
the participant was an LDC, it could submit its schedules by April 15,
1995.
237. Pursuant to the Ministerial Decision on Measures in Favour of
Least-Developed Countries, the General Council approved schedules on
goods and services of 20 least-developed country Members(386) at
its meeting of 31 May 1995. The General Council approved on exceptional
basis the schedules of the Solomon Islands at its meeting of 13 and 15
December 1995.(387)
238. The General Council also adopted a decision on 31 January 1995
on Finalization of Negotiations on Schedules on Goods and Services for
an additional group of GATT contracting parties (Grenada, Papua New
Guinea, St. Kitts and Nevis, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates). For
each of these, there was no accession working party and the General
Council’s approval of their schedules was deemed to be the Members’
approval of the terms of accession under Article
XII. The WTO Agreement
entered into force for each 30 days after its acceptance of a simplified
Protocol of Accession.
“Contracting parties to the GATT 1947, which became contracting
parties in the course of 1994, and which submitted their draft Schedules
to the GATT 1994 and to the GATS before the date of entry into force of
the WTO Agreement but were unable to complete the negotiations on them
before that date, may submit the negotiated Schedules to the GATT 1994
and the GATS to the General Council until 31 March 1995. The approval by
the General Council of such schedules shall be deemed to be the approval
of the terms of accession by the Members of the WTO under Article XII,
paragraph 2 of the WTO Agreement.”(388)
XIII. Article XII
back to top
A. Text of Article XII
Article XII: Accession
1. Any State or separate customs territory possessing full autonomy
in the conduct of its external commercial relations and of the other
matters provided for in this Agreement and the Multilateral Trade
Agreements may accede to this Agreement, on terms to be agreed between
it and the WTO. Such accession shall apply to this Agreement and the
Multilateral Trade Agreements annexed thereto.
2. Decisions on accession shall be taken by the Ministerial
Conference. The Ministerial Conference shall approve the agreement on
the terms of accession by a two-thirds majority of the Members of the
WTO.
3. Accession to a Plurilateral Trade Agreement shall be governed by
the provisions of that Agreement.
B. Interpretation and Application of Article XII
1. Article XII:1
(a) “Any State or separate customs territory … may accede to this
Agreement”
239. As of 30 September 2011, 25 Members had negotiated terms of
accession to the WTO Agreement, including an accession decision, an
accession protocol and an accession working party report. See the table
of accessions at the end of this Chapter.
240. In addition, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, St. Kitts and Nevis,
Qatar and the United Arab Emirates completed accession in 1995–96
through the simplified Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade
Organization 53 procedures under Article XII described in
paragraph 238 above.
(b) Working parties on accession
(i) Establishment, terms of reference and customary procedures
241. The General Council establishes a working party on accession in
response to a formal request by a State or separate customs territory
seeking accession. The General Council sets the following terms of
reference for a working party on accession: “to examine the
application for accession to the WTO under Article XII and to submit to
the General Council/Ministerial Conference recommendations which may
include a draft Protocol of Accession”.(389)
242. A series of Technical Notes by the Secretariat provide
comprehensive information on WTO practice on accession procedures, and
an analysis of past accession provisions.(390)
(ii) Continuation of GATT 1947 accession working parties
243. The General Council agreed at its first meeting of 31 January
1995, that “as and when requests for the WTO accession under Article
XII were made by states and separate customs territories for whom a GATT
1947 working party already existed, the existing working parties should
continue their work as WTO accession working parties, with standard
terms of reference and their respective current chairpersons”.(391)
(iii) Completed accession processes
244. The General Council has established working parties on accession
on behalf of the Ministerial Conference.(392) In the period since
1 January 1995 up to 30 September 2011, the General Council has
established 6 accession Working Parties that have completed their work,
for the Kyrgyz Republic, Georgia, Oman, Viet Nam, Tonga and Cape Verde.(393)
245. Of the working parties on accession carried over from GATT 1947,
19 accessions have been completed as at 30 September 2011, including:
Albania, Armenia, Bulgaria, Cambodia, People’s Republic of China,
Chinese Taipei, Croatia, Ecuador, Estonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia, Jordan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Nepal, Panama,
Saudi Arabia and Ukraine.(394)
(iv) Ongoing accession processes
246. The General Council has established the following accession
working parties, still ongoing as of 30 September 2011, for: Afghanistan(395),
Andorra(396),
Azerbaijan(397),
Bahamas(398),
Bhutan(399), Bosnia and
Herzegovina(400),
Comoros(401), Equatorial
Guinea(402),
Ethiopia(403), Iran(404),
Iraq(405),
Kazakhstan(406), Lao
PDR(407),
Lebanese Republic(408),
Liberia(409), Libya(410),
Montenegro(411),
Samoa(412), Sao Tome and
Principe(413),
Serbia(414),
Seychelles(415), Syrian Arab
Republic(416),
Tajikistan(417),
Vanuatu(418) and
Yemen.(419)
247. Five working parties on accession carried over from the GATT
1947 were still active as of 30 September 2011, including: Algeria,
Belarus, the Russian Federation, Sudan and Uzbekistan.
(c) Accession decisions adopted by the WTO
248. The General Council, acting on behalf of the Ministerial
Conference, has adopted 25 accession decisions with accession protocols,
and thus the WTO Agreement has entered into force for: Ecuador, Qatar,
Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Papua New Guinea, United Arab Emirates,
Mongolia, Republic of Panama, Bulgaria, Latvia, Kyrgyz Republic,
Estonia, Georgia, Jordan, Albania, Croatia, Oman, Lithuania, Moldova,
China, Chinese Taipei, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Armenia,
Nepal. See the table of accessions at the end of this Chapter.
249. Qatar, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Grenada, Papua New Guinea and the
United Arab Emirates were GATT contracting parties, but finalized their
schedules in 1995, and thus acceded to the WTO instead of becoming
original Members.
(d) Observer status for applicants for accession
250. At its first meeting on 31 January 1995, the General Council
decided to grant observer status to governments whose accession process
had already begun(420), as was the practice under GATT (also see
paragraph 228 above).(421) Governments observers to WTO bodies as
of 30 September 2011 are listed in a table at the end of this Chapter.
(e) Accession by least-developed countries
251. At the High-Level Meeting on Integrated Initiatives for
Least-Developed Countries’ Trade Development, of 27–28 October 1997
(see paragraph 109), Members recommended that the WTO take steps to
assist LDCs in the process of accession.(422) Pursuant to
paragraph 42 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration, in 2002 the
Sub-Committee on Least-Developed Countries established a work programme
(see the material at paragraph 111 and following) including a mandate
from ministers to “facilitate and accelerate negotiations with
acceding Least-Developed Countries.”(423)
252. On 10 December 2002, the General Council adopted a decision on
guidelines for the Accession of Least-Developed Countries(424),
to facilitate and accelerate negotiations for the accession of LDCs
through simplified and streamlined procedures. The Decision set out
guidelines in the following broad areas: Market Access, WTO Rules,
Process, and Trade-Related Technical Assistance and Capacity Building.
The Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration noted in this connection: “We
stress the importance of facilitating and accelerating the accession
negotiations of least developed countries, taking due account of the
guidelines on LDC accession adopted by the General Council in December
2002.”(425)
(f) Nature of commitments in accession protocols
253. In China
— Raw Materials, in a finding not
appealed by any party to the dispute, the Panel explained that the terms
of accession protocols are integral parts of the WTO Agreement and are
enforceable in dispute settlement:
“Accession to the WTO is achieved through negotiation with other
WTO Members. Pursuant to Article XII of the Marrakesh
Agreement,
accessions take place ‘on terms to be agreed’ between the acceding
Member and the WTO membership. Most accession processes take several
years to complete and lead to detailed negotiated provisions. The terms
of each WTO Member’s accession are set out in its Accession Protocol
and accompanying Working Party Report. The negotiated agreement between
the WTO membership and the acceding Member results in a delicate balance
of rights and obligations, which are reflected in the specific wording
of each commitment set out in these documents. Ultimately, the acceding
Member and the WTO membership recognize that the intensively negotiated
content of an accession package is the ‘entry fee’ to the WTO
system.
WTO Members’ accession protocols are considered to form integral
parts of the WTO Agreement. For example, Paragraph 1.2 of Part I of
China’s Accession Protocol provides:
‘The WTO Agreement to which China accedes shall be the WTO
Agreement as rectified, amended or otherwise modified by such legal
instruments as may have entered into force before the date of accession.
This Protocol, which shall include the commitments referred to in
paragraph 342 of the Working Party Report, shall be an integral part of the WTO Agreement.’
(italics added)
In this dispute, as with previous disputes concerned with China’s
Accession Protocol, all parties agree that China’s Accession Protocol
forms an integral part of the WTO Agreement. Moreover, all parties agree
that WTO Members can initiate WTO dispute settlement proceedings on the
basis of a claim of violation of China’s Accession Protocol.(426)
Finally, all parties agree that commitments included in the related
Working Party Report, and incorporated into the Accession Protocol by
cross-reference, are binding and enforceable through WTO dispute
settlement proceedings.
Accordingly, the Panel will interpret the provisions of China’s
Accession Protocol — like those of the WTO covered agreements — in
accordance with the customary rules of interpretation of public
international law, including those codified in Articles 31, 32 and 33 of
the Vienna Convention.”(427)
2. Article XII:2
(a) Decision-making procedures on accession
254. Regarding decision-making procedures applicable to requests for
accessions to the WTO, see paragraph 203 above.
3. Article XII:3: Acceptance of or accession to a Plurilateral Trade
Agreement
(a) Agreement on Government Procurement
255.
Article XXIV of the Agreement on Government Procurement provides
for accession “on terms to be agreed between that government and the
Parties”.
256. As at 30 September 2011, there have been six accessions to the
Agreement on Government Procurement as provided in the above table.
(b) Other Plurilateral Trade Agreements
257. The International Bovine Meat Agreement and the International
Dairy Agreement were terminated, and were deleted from the WTO
Agreement; see paragraph 218 above.
258.
Article 9.1 of the Agreement on Civil Aircraft provides for
acceptance and accession. As of 30 September 2011, there had been no
accessions to this Agreement; see under Article XIV:4 regarding
acceptances.
Footnotes:
269. WT/L/195. back
to text
270. S/C/11. back
to text
271. WT/L/272. back
to text
272.
WT/L/195. back
to text
273.
IP/C/6. back
to text
274. See The Rules of Procedure of the General Council,
Chapter IV, Rule 11. Rule 11 of the Rules of Procedure for the General
Council provides: “Representatives of international intergovernmental
organizations may attend the meetings as observers on the invitation of
the General Council in accordance with the guidelines in Annex 3 to
these Rules.” back
to text
275. WT/GC/M/3,
4, 5,
6, 8,
13,
17. The General Council, upon the
recommendation of the Preparatory Committee, extended ad hoc
observer status to the UN, UNCTAD, IMF and the World Bank for the first
General Council meeting. WT/GC/M/1. In subsequent meetings,
WIPO, FAO,
and the OECD were extended the same invitation. WT/GC/M/3,
4, 5,
6, 8,
13,
17. back
to text
276. With respect to the Agreement with the
IMF, see
WT/L/195,
Annex I, para. 6. Also, with respect to the Agreement with the World
Bank, see
WT/L/195, Annex II, para. 5. back
to text
277. WT/GC/M/18. back
to text
278. WT/GC/M/25. Note that this was a grant of permanent observer
status. back
to text
279.
WT/L/161. back
to text
280. WT/GC/M/18,
25, 26,
35,
40/Add.3,
45,
48, 55,
57,
61,
66,
69,
71,
78, 80,
81 and
82. A list of these organizations is provided in
Section II of WT/GC/W/51/Rev.10. back
to text
281. See, e.g.,
WT/MIN(05)/INF/7/Rev.3 (final participant list
for Hong Kong Ministerial Conference) and /INF/ documents for other
Ministerial Conferences. back
to text
282.
WT/GC/M/13, section 9(c). The text of the adopted guidelines
can be found in
WT/L/162. back
to text
283. WT/GC/M/29,
35,
45,
57, 58,
66. back
to text
284.
WT/GC/M/13, section 11(b). See
WT/L/162 for the text of the
guidelines. back
to text
285. WT/GC/M/65,
66,
68, 78,
95; see, e.g., list of NGOs
accredited to attend the 2009 Seventh Session of the Ministerial
Conference at Geneva (WT/MIN(09)/INF/10). back
to text
286. See GATT Analytical Index. back
to text
287. GATT Analytical Index, pp. 1122–1123. back
to text
288. PC/9,
L/7580; signed and executed agreement issued as
ICITO/1/39;
approved in WT/GC/M/1, L/36. back
to text
289. WT/L/282. back
to text
290. Mr Sutherland, as the former Director-General to the GATT
1947, served as the first Director-General pursuant to Article XVI:2 of
the WTO Agreement. back
to text
291. Appointed at the General Council meeting of 24 March 1995
(see
WT/GC/M/2, p. 1). back
to text
292. Appointed at the General Council meeting of 22 July 1999
(see
WT/GC/M/46, p. 18; text of decision,
WT/L/308). back
to text
293. Also appointed at the meeting of 22 July 1999, to succeed to
Mr Moore (see
WT/GC/M/46, p. 18; text of decision,
WT/L/308). back
to text
294. Appointed at the meeting of 26 May 2005
(WT/GC/M/95, item
9); reappointed at the meeting of 29–30 April 2009 (WT/GC/M/119). back
to text
295.
WT/L/308, last paragraph. back
to text
296. WT/GC/M/77;
WT/L/509. In addition, the General Council
approved modified Conditions of Service for the Director-General,
issued as
WT/GC/67. back
to text
297. See
WT/GC/M/95, item 9 and WT/GC/M/119 (appointment and
reappointment of Director-General Lamy). back to text
298. WT/GC/M/7, item 1, decision in
WT/L/91;
WT/GC/M/16, item 6,
decision in
WT/L/197; WT/GC/M/18, item 3, decision in
WT/L/205; WT/GC/M/20, item 1, decision in
WT/L/223; and WT/GC/M/28, item 1,
decision in WT/L/269. back
to text
299.
WT/L/205. back
to text
300. WT/GC/M/31, item 10(a); decision in WT/L/282; Annex 2 of
WT/282 includes the Staff Regulations, Staff Rules and the Regulations
and Administrative Rules of the WTO Pension Plan as adopted. back
to text
301.
WT/GC/M/63 item 3, amendments in
WT/BFA/W/48/Rev.1
(performance award programme). back
to text
302. WT/GC/N/82 item 2, amendments in
WT/BFA/W/102. back
to text
303.
WT/GC/M/86, amendments in
WT/BFA/W/112. back
to text
304.
WT/GC/M/121 item 9, amendments in
WT/BFA/W/185. back
to text
305. GATT Analytical Index, p. 1123. back
to text
306. WT/GC/M/31, item 10(a); Decision including text of WTOPP
Regulations and Administrative Rules, WT/L/282. See also
WT/BFA/12,
WT/BFA/W/2, WT/GC/M/28
and WT/GC/M/29. back
to text
307. WT/GC/W/552 and
WT/GC/M/100;
WT/GC/W/606 and
WT/GC/M/121;
WT/GC/W/637. back
to text
308. WT/L/383; revised agreement in
WT/L/588. back
to text
309. WT/L/446. back
to text
310.
WT/L/513; the Coordinated Organizations include the Council
of Europe, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF),
the European Space Agency (ESA), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) and the Western European Union (WEU). back
to text
311. WT/GC/W/561. back
to text
312. Annual Reports: WT/GC/W/426,
WT/GC/W/463,
WT/L/497, WT/L/546,
WT/L/583, WT/L/628,
WT/L/663,
WT/L/706,
WT/L/736, WT/L/771,
WT/L/802,
WT/BFA/W/240. back
to text
313. Annex 2 to WT/L/282
and Annex B to Annex 2, e.g. Regulation
1.4 of the Staff Regulations and point 4 of the Standards of Conduct. back
to text
314. Annual reports by the Director-General:
WT/BFA/23,
WT/BFA/25 (1995);
WT/BFA/W/15, WT/BFA/W/19 (1996);
WT/BFA/W/25, WT/BFA/W/26
(1997); WT/BFA/W/33,
WT/BFA/W/34 (1998); WT/BFA/W/42 (1999);
WT/BFA/W/57
(2000); WT/BFA/W/97 (2002);
WT/BFA/W/114 (2003);
WT/BFA/W/128 (2004); WT/BFA/W/142 ( 2005);
WT/BFA/W/157 (2006);
WT/BFA/W/168 (2007);
WT/BFA/W/181
(2008). back
to text
315. Recommendations: see WT/BFA/2,
3,
4,
5 (including
Add.1),
6,
7,
8, 13,
15,
16,
18,
20,
21,
22,
24, 26,
28,
30,
31,
32,
33 (including
Add.1 and
Corr.1), 35,
36,
38,
39,
40,
44,
45,
46,
47, 48,
49,
51,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56, 58,
59,
60, 62,
63,
64,
67,
70,
71–
2,
73, 75,
77,
78,
80,
82,
84, 86,
87, 89,
90, 93,
93/Add.1.,
95, 97,
101,
102,
103, 104,
105,
106,
107,
111,
112, 113 and
Add.1, 114 and
Add.1,
115,
118, 119,
120, 121,
124. back
to text
316. WT/BFA/2
adopted 3 April 1995, WT/GC/M/3;
WT/BFA/3 and 4
adopted 31 May 1995, WT/GC/M/4;
WT/BFA/5 adopted 11 July 1995,
WT/GC/M/5; WT/BFA/6,
7 and
8 adopted 15 November 1995,
WT/GC/M/8; WT/BFA/13
and 15 adopted on 13 and 15 December 1995,
WT/GC/M/9;
WT/BFA/16 and
18 adopted on 6 February 1996, WT/GC/M/10;
WT/BFA/20, 21 and
22 adopted on
16 April 1996, WT/GC/M/11;
WT/BFA/24
adopted on 26 June 1996,
WT/GC/M/12;
WT/BFA/26 adopted on 18 July 1996,
WT/GC/M/13; WT/BFA/28
adopted on 26 November 1996, WT/GC/M/17;
WT/BFA/30 adopted on 24 April
1997,
WT/GC/M/19;
WT/BFA/31 adopted on 16 July 1997,
WT/GC/M/21; WT/BFA/32 adopted on 22 October 1997, WT/GC/M/23;
WT/BFA/33 adopted on 10
December 1997, WT/GC/M/25;
WT/BFA/35 adopted on 24 April 1998, WT/GC/M/28;
WT/BFA/36 adopted on 15, 16 and 22 July 1998, WT/GC/M/29;
WT/BFA/38 adopted on 9–11 and 18 December
1998, WT/GC/M/32;
WT/BFA/39
and 40 adopted on 15 July 1999, WT/GC/M/45; WT/BFA/44
adopted on 17
December 1999, WT/GC/M/52
and Corr.1;
WT/BFA/45 adopted on 7 and 8
February 2000,
WT/GC/M/53;
WT/BFA/46 adopted on 3 and 8 May 2000,
WT/GC/M/55;
WT/BFA/47 and
48 adopted on 17 and 19 July 2000, WT/GC/M/57; WT/BFA/49
adopted on 10 October 2000,
WT/GC/M/58; WT/BFA/51 adopted 7
February 2001,
WT/GC/M/61;
WT/BFA/52 adopted 2 March 2001,
WT/GC/M/63;
WT/BFA/53 adopted 10 August 2001, WT/GC/M/66;
WT/BFA/54 adopted 26
October WT/GC/ M/69; WT/BFA/55 adopted 13 December 2001,
WT/GC/M/71;
WT/BFA/56
adopted 6 February 2002, WT/GC/M/72; WT/BFA/58–59 adopted 27
September 2002, WT/GC/M/75;
WT/BFA/60 adopted 5 November 2002, WT/GC/M/76; WT/BFA/62, adopted 13 February 2003, WT/GC/M/77;
WT/BFA/63
adopted 18 July 2003,
WT/GC/M/80; WT/BFA/64
adopted 28 August 2003, WT/GC/M/81; WT/BFA/67
adopted 13 November 2003, WT/GC/M/82; WT/BFA/70
adopted on 16 December 2003,
WT/GC/M/84;
WT/BFA/71–2
adopted on 18 May 2004,
WT/GC/M/86;
WT/BFA/73 adopted on 1 August 2004, WT/GC/M/87;
WT/BFA/75
adopted on 13 December 2004, WT/GC/M/90;
WT/BFA/77 adopted on 27 May
2005,
WT/GC/M/95; WT/BFA/78 adopted on 27 and 29 July 2005,
WT/GC/M/97;
WT/BFA/80 adopted on 1, 2 and 6 December 2005,
WT/GC/M/100;
WT/BFA/82
adopted on 1, 2 and 6 December 2005,
WT/GC/M/100; WT/BFA/84 adopted on 8
February 2006,
WT/GC/M/101;
WT/BFA/86 adopted on 15 May 2006, WT/GC/M/102;
WT/BFA/87
adopted on 27 and 28 July 2006, WT/GC/M/103;
WT/BFA/89
adopted on 10 October 2006,
WT/GC/M/104; WT/BFA/90 adopted on 10 October
2006,
WT/GC/M/104; WT/BFA/93 adopted on 14 and 15 December 2006,
WT/GC/M/106; WT/BFA/93/Add.1 adopted on 14 and 15 December 2006,
WT/GC/M/106; WT/BFA/95
adopted on 9 May 2007,
WT/GC/M/108; WT/BFA/97
adopted on 27 July 2007, WT/GC/M/109; WT/BFA/101 adopted on 18 December
2007, WT/GC/M/112;
WT/BFA/102 adopted on 7–8 May 2008,
WT/GC/M/114;
WT/BFA/103 adopted on 31 July 2008,
WT/GC/M/115;
WT/BFA/104 adopted on
31 July 2008,
WT/GC/M/115;
WT/BFA/105 adopted on 18–19 December 2008,
WT/GC/M/117;
WT/BFA/106 adopted on 18–19 December 2008,
WT/GC/M/117;
WT/BFA/107 adopted on 18–19 December 2008,
WT/GC/M/117; WT/BFA/109 and
110 adopted on 26–27 May 2009,
WT/GC/M/120;
WT/BFA/111 adopted on 28
July 2009, WT/GC/M/121;
WT/BFA/114 and
Add.1, adopted on 17 December
2009, WT/GC/M/124; WT/BFA/115, adopted on 4 May 2010,
WT/GC/M/126;
WT/BFA/116
and
117, adopted on 29 July 2010,
WT/GC/M/127;
WT/BFA/118, adopted on 21
October 2010, WT/GC/M/128; WT/BFA/119,
120 and
121, adopted on 14
December 2010, WT/GC/M/129;
WT/ BFA/123, adopted on 3 May 2011,
WT/GC/M/131;
WT/BFA/124. back
to text
317.
WT/GC/M/8, section 7(c); text of Financial Regulations in WT/L/156, text of Financial Rules in WT/L/157. back
to text
318. WT/BFA/13,
L/7649, Section VII. back
to text
319. GATT Analytical Index, pp. 1126–1127. back
to text
320. PC/BFA/M/1, Annex II. back
to text
321.
WT/GC/M/8, item 7(a). back
to text
322. WT/BFA/6. back
to text
323. WT/BFA/44, approved in
WT/GC/M/52. back
to text
324. Recommendation in WT/BFA/49, approved in
WT/GC/M/58. back
to text
325.
PC/7, “Measures To Deal With Members in Category IV of the
Administrative Arrangements on Arrears”. back
to text
326. WT/GC/M/102, item 7. back
to text
327.
WT/BFA/86 paragraphs 14–16; see also WT/BFA/W/141. back
to text
328. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1,
para. 40. back
to text
329.
WT/GC/M/84; WT/BFA/70; see also
WT/BFA/W/107. back
to text
330.
WT/GC/M/8, section 7(c). WT/L/156 and
Rev.1 and
Rev.2. Text of Financial Rules: WT/L/157 and
Rev.1. 2003 amendments:
WT/BFA/W/105/Rev.1,
WT/BFA/67,
WT/GC/M/82. 2007
amendments: WT/BFA/W/155,
WT/BFA/95,
WT/GC/M/108. back
to text
331.
WT/GC/M/61,
WT/L/386; see also WT/BFA/41 and Adds. 1–6. back
to text
332. WT/GC/M/87; WT/L/386/Rev.1. back
to text
333. Staff Regulation 1.6; see also
WT/GC/W/103. back
to text
334. See G.A. Res. 179(III) of 21 November 1947, United Nations
Treaty Series; 33 UNTS, p. 261. back
to text
335. WT/GC/1. back
to text
336. WT/GC/M/4,
WT/L/69. back
to text
337. WT/GC/2. back
to text
338.
WT/GC/M/115;
WT/BFA/W/170; WT/BFA/103. back
to text
339. PC/9,
L/7580; signed and executed agreement issued as
ICITO/1/39;
approved in
WT/GC/M/1, L/36. back
to text
340.
WT/L/93. See also below under Article XII. back
to text
341.
Appellate Body Report, Japan — Alcoholic
Beverages II, pp. 12–15. back
to text
342.
Appellate Body Report, Japan — Alcoholic
Beverages II,
p. 13. back
to text
343. (footnote original) The “matter in issue” is the
“matter referred to the DSB” pursuant to Article 7 of the DSU. back
to text
344. (footnote original) Japan — Taxes on Alcoholic
Beverages, AB-1996-2, adopted 1 November 1996, WT/DS8/AB/R,
WT/DS10/AB/R,
WT/DS11/AB/R, p. 13. back
to text
345.
Appellate Body Report, US — Wool Shirts and
Blouses, pp. 19–20. back
to text
346.
WT/GC/W/133; see also
WT/GC/143 (request for special meeting
of the General Council) and response in WT/GC/W/144. back
to text
347.
WT/GC/M/35, items 5 and 6. back
to text
348. Appellate Body Report, US — FSC, fn. 127. back
to text
349. Panel Report,
Chile — Price Band System,
para. 7.94. back
to text
350.
Appellate Body Report, EC — Bananas III (Article
21.5 — Ecuador II)/EC— Bananas III (Article 21.5
— US), para.
393. back
to text
351.
WT/GC/M/8, section 3,
WT/L/93. back
to text
352.
WT/L/93, first paragraph. back
to text
353. Excluding waivers of Article II of the GATT 1994 agreed in
connection with transposition of tariff schedules to the Harmonized
System (HS) nomenclature, or the implementation of periodic HS
nomenclature amendments. back
to text
354. The list in MTN/W/FA referred to in footnote 6 omitted the
1955 waiver granted to the United States in connection with import
restrictions imposed under Section 22 of the US Agricultural Adjustment
Act (BISD 3S/32); the restrictions provided for in this waiver were
tariffied in the Uruguay Round and in any event, this waiver was
terminated by operation of the Understanding in Respect of Waivers of
Obligations under the GATT 1994. back
to text
355.
WT/L/3 and
Corr.1. back
to text
356.
Panel Report, EC — Bananas III,
para. 7.107. back
to text
357. Appellate Body Report,
EC — Bananas III,
para. 183. back
to text
358. (footnote original) Panel Report on
US
— Sugar Waiver, para. 5.9. back
to text
359. (footnote original) Waiver Granted in Connection with
the European Coal and Steel Community, Decision of 10 November 1952,
BISD 1S/17, para. 3. back
to text
360. Appellate Body Report,
EC — Bananas III,
paras. 184–187. back
to text
361.
Appellate Body Report, EC — Bananas III (Article
21.5 — Ecuador II)/EC—
Bananas III (Article 21.5
— US), paras.
381–382. back
to text
362.
Appellate Body Report, EC — Bananas III (Article
21.5 — Ecuador II)/EC—
Bananas III (Article 21.5
— US), para.
390. back
to text
363.
Appellate Body Report, EC — Bananas III (Article
21.5 — Ecuador II)/EC—
Bananas III (Article 21.5
— US), para. 394. back
to text
364.
Appellate Body Report, EC — Bananas III (Article
21.5 — Ecuador II)/EC—
Bananas III (Article 21.5
— US), para.
380. back
to text
365. Proposal for General Council decision:
IP/C/41. Decision by
Council for TRIPS:
IP/C/M/49, paras. 214–215. back
to text
366. JOB(05)/319 and Corr.1; JOB(05)/320. back
to text
367. Decision: WT/L/641. Adoption:
WT/GC/M/100, paras. 24–34.
Agreed statements:
WT/GC/M/100, paras. 28–29. back
to text
368. Extension decisions:
WT/L/711, WT/L/785. back
to text
369. Acceptances: United States, Switzerland, El Salvador,
Republic of Korea, Norway, India, Philippines, Israel, Japan, Australia,
Singapore, Hong Kong China, People’s Republic of China, European
Communities, Mauritius, Egypt, Mexico, Jordan, Brazil, Morocco, Albania,
Macao (China), Canada, Bahrain, Colombia, Zambia, Nicaragua, Pakistan,
former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Uganda, Mongolia
(IP/C/W/490/Rev.7); Croatia (WT/Let/747), Senegal (WT/Let/753),
Bangladesh (WT/Let/758). back
to text
370.
IDA/8,
IMA/8. back
to text
371.
WT/L/251, WT/L/252. back
to text
372. GPA/W/297 (2006 text);
GPA/89, paras. 20–21 (conditions
governing adoption of text);
GPA/W/313 and Corr.1 (text as at 13
December 2010). back
to text
373. AIR/65. back
to text
374.
TCA/4. back
to text
375.
WT/L/161. The provisions on observership follow those
adopted by the GATT Council on 21 July 1993 (see L/7286, C/M/265). See
also GATT Analytical Index, pp. 1102–1104. back
to text
376.
WT/L/161, Annex 2, para. 3. back
to text
377.
WT/L/161, Annex 2, para. 4. Paragraph 8 provides that if at
the end of five years, an observer government has not yet initiated
accession negotiations, it may request an extension of its observer
status; see, e.g.,
WT/L/445, WT/GC/M/74 (extension of observer status
for Ethiopia in 2002). back
to text
378. WT/L/221,
WT/GC/M/21. back
to text
379. A Decision adopted by the General Council on 24 April 1997
(
WT/L/208) extended the 1 January 1997 deadline for the Republic of the
Congo retroactively to 25 February 1997, the date when the
Director-General received notice of its ratification of the WTOAgreement.
WT/L/208 notes that the Republic of the Congo was the only remaining
contracting party to the GATT 1947 that was eligible for original
Membership and had not yet become a Member. back
to text
380. Note that the text of the Agreement identifies the original
Member as the European Communities. back
to text
381. Since 1 July 1997, when sovereignty over Hong Kong reverted
to China, this separate customs territory has been known as “Hong
Kong, China”. back
to text
382. Since 20 December 1999, when sovereignty over Macao reverted
to China, this separate customs territory has been known as “Macao,
China”. back
to text
383. Decision text in section XIX.A.4 below. The agreed
modalities for agriculture in the Uruguay Round (reflected in MTN.GNG/MA/W/24 and
MTN.GNG/MA/W/25) required participants to establish schedules
including tariff bindings for all agricultural products, as well as
commitments on domestic support and export subsidies. back
to text
384. MTN.TNC/40; text in section XIX.A.4 below. back
to text
385. Decision text in section XIX.A.4 below; para. 1(b) and (c). back
to text
386. WT/GC/M/4, section 2; Decision in
WT/L/70 (covering Angola,
Botswana, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Djibouti, the Gambia,
Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Haiti, Lesotho, Malawi, Maldives, Mali,
Mauritania, Mozambique, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Togo and Zaire). back
to text
387.
WT/GC/M/9, section 1(i). back
to text
388.
WT/GC/M/1, section 4.I(f); decision in
WT/L/30; proposed by
Preparatory Committee in PC/17. On 3 April 1995, the General Council
extended the deadline in
WT/L/30 for the submission of negotiated
schedules for goods and services until 24 April 1995 (WT/GC/M/3). back
to text
389. WT/ACC/1, para. 5. back
to text
390.
WT/ACC/10/Rev.4, 11 January 2010, and
WT/ACC/10/Rev.4/Add.1,
25 May 2010. back
to text
391.
WT/GC/M/1, section 4.I(g). At the same meeting, the General
Council applied this treatment to Belarus. WT/GC/M/1, section 4.I(g). back
to text
392. WT/ACC/1,
para. 5. back
to text
393. Document references: Kyrgyz Republic (WT/GC/M/31, Working
Party established April 1996, accession protocol accepted 14, 16 and 23
October 1998, decision
WT/ACC/KGZ/28); Georgia (
WT/GC/M/48, Working
Party established July 1996, accession protocol accepted 6October 1999,
decision
WT/ACC/GEO/32),Oman (WT/GC/M/58,Working Party established June
1996, accession protocol accepted 10 October 2000, decision
WT/ACC/OMN/27);
Viet Nam (WT/GC/M/1, section 3, Working Party established, accession
protocol accepted, decision
WT/L/662); Tonga (WT/GC/M/8, decision
WT/L/644); and Cape Verde (decision
WT/L/715). back
to text
394. Document references: Albania (Working Party established 10
December 1992, accession protocol accepted 17 and 19 July 2000, decision
WT/ACC/ALB/52); Armenia (Working Party established 17 December 1993,
accession protocol accepted 5 February 2004, decision
WT/L/506);
Bulgaria (Working Party established November 1986 and February 1990;
accession protocol accepted 2 October 1996; accession decision
WT/ACC/BGR/6);
Cambodia (Working Party established 21 December 1994, accession protocol
accepted 11 September 2003, decision
WT/MIN(03)/18); People’s Republic
of China (Working Party established March 1987, accession protocol
accepted 11 November 2001, decision WT/L/432); Chinese Taipei (Working
Party established 1 October 1992, accession protocol accepted 11
November 2001, decision WT/L/43); Croatia (Working Party established 27
October 1993, accession protocol accepted 17 and 19 July 2000, decision
WT/ACC/HRV/60); Ecuador (Working Party established October 1992,
accession protocol accepted 31 July 1995, accession decision WT/ACC/ECU/5); Estonia (Working Party established 23 March 1994, accession protocol
accepted 21May 1999, decision
WT/ACC/EST/29); former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia (Working Party established 21 December 1994, accession
protocol accepted 15 October 2002, decision
WT/L/494); Jordan (Working
Party established 25 January 1994, accession protocol accepted 17
December 1999, decision
WT/ACC/JOR/34); Latvia (Working Party
established December 1993, accession protocol accepted 14, 16 and 23
October 1998, decision
WT/ACC/LVA/34); Lithuania (Working Party
established February 1994, accession protocol accepted 7, 8, 11 and 15
December 2000, decision
WT/ACC/LTU/53); Moldova (Working Party
established 17 December 1993, accession protocol accepted 8May 2001,
decision
WT/ACC/MOL/40); Mongolia (Working Party established October
1991, accession protocol accepted 18 July 1996, decision
WT/ACC/MNG/10);
Nepal (Working Party established 21–22 June 1989, accession protocol
accepted 11 September 2003, decision
WT/MIN(03)19); Panama (Working
Party established October 1991, accession protocol accepted 18 July
1996, decision a
WT/ACC/MNG/10); Saudi Arabia (Working Party established
July 1993, accession protocol accepted November 2005, decision
WT/L/627); and Ukraine (Working Party established December 1993,
accession protocol accepted June 2007, decision
WT/L/718). back
to text
395.
WT/GC/M/9. back
to text
396. WT/GC/M/23. back
to text
397.
WT/GC/M/21. back
to text
398.
WT/GC/M/66. back
to text
399.
WT/GC/M/48. back
to text
400. WT/GC/M/45.
back to text
401.
WT/GC/M/110. back
to text
402. WT/GC/M/113. back
to text
403.
WT/GC/M/78. back
to text
404.
WT/GC/M/95. back
to text
405. WT/GC/M/90. back
to text
406.
WT/GC/M/10. back
to text
407. WT/GC/M/26. back
to text
408.
WT/GC/M/40. back
to text
409.
WT/GC/M/112. back
to text
410.
WT/GC/M/87. back
to text
411. WT/GC/M/91. back
to text
412.
WT/GC/M/29. back
to text
413.
WT/GC/M/95. back
to text
414. WT/GC/M/91. back
to text
415. WT/GC/M/5.2(a). back
to text
416.
WT/GC/M/126. back
to text
417.
WT/GC/M/66. back
to text
418.
WT/GC/M/5. back
to text
419. WT/GC/M/57. back
to text
420.
WT/GC/M/1. back
to text
421. See GATT Analytical Index. back
to text
422.
WT/LDC/HL/23, the section dealing with Thematic Round Table
A, para. II(b). With respect to the High-Level Meeting generally, see
para. 112. back
to text
423. See WT/COMTD/LDC/11, Section (f), para. 18(iii). back
to text
424. WT/L/508. back
to text
425. WT/MIIN(05)/DEC, para. 59. back
to text
426. (Footnote original) This was recognized in
China — Auto Parts, adopted on 15 December 2008 and in China — Publications and Audiovisual
Products, adopted on 19 January 2010
when both panels and Appellate Body assessed claims based on China’s
Accession Protocol. back
to text
427.
Panel Report, China — Raw Materials, paras.
7.112–7.115. back
to text
|

|